Droid Engineer Archive
Thread: (W) Focus Thread: Drawing the new line here
Im kinda confused what your asking.
But i think if your asking everyone to be in agreement you will never have that.
IF you are asking if we want communication then YES
The question is how do we get that
YES!!!
But to tell you the truth, nothing we do is going to work, except one thing.
BOYCOTT!!!
Don't give up the DE tree you have so hard to work for, but STOP MAKING DROIDS.
Tell everyone that wants a droid, "I would love to make one for you, but SOE has refused to fix the droids andnone of them work like they should. Anything I make for you will not enhance your gaming experience andI will not sell shotty products to you or anyone else."
We alone cannot make a difference. The entie SWG player community has to get behind us for this to work. SOE refuses to hear us or consider our proposals. Their past record proves that. Wake up people!!!! SOE does not care!!!!
Goss
We screwed ourselves over by being wishy-washy over the combat droid issue. That was to be the "Droid Invastion". We killed it for ourselves.
At this point, we'd be lucky to have the long-outstanding bugs fixed, let alone new content.
The problem with the Devs listening to what we're saying... sometimes they listen too much. We confused the bajeebus out of them. They should have just gone with their original plan; we'd've gotten over it, and we'd have new content.
That said, I'm not participating inanother pointless yes/no poll, especially one labelled as a "focus thread". A focus thread is to promote conversation, not silly yes/no polls.
Its time to move on...
yes
but its a useless poll.. you're basically asking do you want new content for your profession. its quite possible to hit 99% of every profession with that one.
Note: Kids...don't try writing polls at home. This should only be done by professionals that know how to put forth polls that will cover the topics at issue and not bias the results via vague or enigmatic wording.
My answer to your poll is: Huh?
/bow
Respectfully,