Development Cycle Archive
Thread: SWG Forum Ranking Changes...
GarVa wrote:
Actually some of the most popular people (in a good way) do not even qualify for higher ranks in the star ranked tree, so no... thatidea is incorrect, it is not about that. It is meant to reflect post quality, some people will never like it but it will happen in some form or another. Your concerns are the exact reason that the system was made, it is a means for the community to voice to each other how they feel about one another. If you see your self getting lots of low ratings you may go "oh wonder how I can post better to keep that from happening", or you can just choose to ignore it.
Editing will be at the rank 2 mark (for those that asked)
We understand your motivationGarva but you are only presuming that everyone will go "oh wonder how i can post better or make people like me".
In Virtualreality world this rule can not be applied like in real life due mainly to anonymity. You beleive that every posters will behave normally if they get 1 stared by a 1 star bandit. Not everyone istrying to be a betterperson.Noteveryone hasthe same IQ orare mentally healthy to make judgment...Also some players just don't care.
Not only the 1 starers give 1 starwhen they disagree with the posters but they also use it to attack players.
The Starring system is so completely wrong. It is a tool used tofrustrate and attack so many innocent players on the forum. The1 star bandits use their alternate accounts to 1 star someone's post for all kind of reason including evil actions in-game.
Ifthe posters are getting one star because theyare hunting, crafting andselling,You can not force the 1 starvictims to stop hunting , selling or crafting can you ?
The Starring post column need to be removed completely.
There has been many rumors about SOEusing the starring system for their interest as well.
By the way, a friendof uswho designed many SOE sites had toquit SOE few months ago because of the decisions like this that were always coming from Top-Down.
Remove the Starring system andyou will see more people enjoying the forum.
Message Edited by Kathleen on 08-19-2004 09:15 PM
Thunderheart wrote:
Please let us know what you think about this.
Thanks!
I love it, they will think twice before they say"first" nowlol
Message Edited by eman7h on 08-19-2004 10:54 AM
Each month set a poster recieves a new rank/title, avatar set and reward. If he qualifies for the sub-categories of that month set he can also recieve another avatar set and reward. Otherwise he will recieve that avatar set and reward with the next month set. With this method, veterans do not have to continually "up" there post count just to recieve rewards and higher ranks. However if they want to or already qualify for the sub-categories post count and post rating, then they can recieve rewards early. No newer poster will ever have something an older poster doesnt have, reguardless of post count. However two posters of equal participation time can have diffrent ranks and rewards if one poster qualifies for the sub-categories and the other does not. But the one who does not will recieve those same rewards as time progresses.
Message Edited by CommanderRamius on 08-19-2004 12:39 PM