Development Cycle Archive

Thread: AT-ST changes on Test Center

AtamarAsimov
Tue Dec 02, 2003 10:59 am
#157

Just for the record, I (and I think most Imps from what I've read) aren't upset that the ATST isn't invincible. They aren't upset that it means that they can't solo kryat's or farm holocrons. Take those things out, sure. you're right, it screws up the game. I am frustrated because 10kFP (for humans) takes A LONG TIME to earn when you're not just picking them up from FP terms on test. A LONG LONG time of running pointless, boring FP missions. Sure, rebel troopers may be weak compared to it. But they only cost like 400FP (I assume, I know ST Commando's only cost like 400FP). For 400FP I wouldn't MIND so much if it got killed (and haven't in the past). I'll go earn another one, you (as a rebel) and I can have fun fighting it, then when it dies I won't be all pissed. But at 10kFP, there's no way I'm not gonna be royally pissed off and in a bad mood when it gets toasted. Imagine if everytime your rancor died you "lost" your Master CH cert and had to re-earn it from Novice CH?


Make all Faction Pets easier to get and people will be running around fighting the GCW a whole lot more often.

boceifus2000
Tue Dec 02, 2003 11:04 am
#158

"First of all, I am sure this flamethrower is not from WWII. Like all weapons in this game, it is futuristic and probably advanced. I am sure that the fuel is not just a midly flamable "gas" that gets shot out with a gentle burst. In the age of light speed travel and battle stations the size of moons, it is not much of a stretch to imagine some super heated, high temp burning fuel that is hot enough to burn metal/mineral."


Your own statement says it all. In this futuristic world we all play in the powers that be would not have developed some sort of defense against such attacks on expensive pieces of war equipment? Such as high resistance to heat based attacks on a metal? The metal would get hot sure but no hand held weapon should generate enough heat to turn the armor into goo. It would kill the person using the weapon.


I stated in an eairlier post that that acid based DOT's should be the bane of AT-ST's. Sombody else stated that blast damage should be. These two combos should be the most effective against any armored scouting vehicle. The only ones wanting it to be invulnrable are imps but I think that is one thing we do agree on..they should not be.





Colonel Boceifus Gadian (BotD)
Retired
Quote: I have seen too much death in my lifetime...

Balanor Gadian
Retired
Quote: I have made so many credits I can buy my own galaxy...
Bail_Runningrider
Tue Dec 02, 2003 11:08 am
#159






YourHonor wrote:

PLEASE JUST TAKE THE **edit** AT-ST OUT OF THE GAME IF IT'S GOING TO BE USELESS! IT'S JUST A FACTION POINT SINK POST PATCH, YOU'LL SEE LESS AND LESS IMPERIALS, YOU JUST SCREWED THE GAME.






In that case, they should just do the same thing to the Droid Engineer profession.JusttakeDE out of the game and make droids available fromNPC vendors. As it stands now, droids are about as useless to the general player populace as the AT-ST will be.
ThorsAnvil
Tue Dec 02, 2003 11:10 am
#160






GrimMethodX wrote:








erikAceman wrote:


i am a moron.






That's all I heard throughout that whole thing.






OMG I agree with a imp??!?!


some call hell and check the temperature!!



But really though, I cant think of why someone show off there IQ like that, did they think it would serve a purpse?


I personally dont like AT-ST, I think they are over powered, its one reason i dont PVP, because I know when I kill an Imp, 20 mins later, a group of Imps with AT-ST's come hunting. so really whats the point.


now as for PVE, it disgusts me even more, I see 20 people in a group killing a krayt, and one guy with 3 AT-ST's going hey bud got my 10 pearl quota for the day.


I think the nerf bat is swinging a bit harsh, but soo many idiot children are causing this because they are over abusing the problem.






Understand JEDI EXP (exp based on normalized kills)

Master Elite Prof 3,891,000 exp / 4200 exp = 926 Rancors for Master Elite anything
Master LightSaber 15,280,000 exp / 1000 exp = 15280 Rancors for Master LS
Janias
Tue Dec 02, 2003 11:13 am
#161

If you are going to do this then we need a way to HEAL THEM. Otherwise no will use them at all ...


Oh wait ... that is what you want anyways.





Janias Napier (Master Bounty Hunter) ¤ Imperial Inquisition Pilot Ace
Lorjan (Pre-Pub9 Dark Jedi) ¤ Imperial Storm Squadron Pilot Ace
Lorakka (Master Politician) Mayor of Thalnax ¤ Smuggler Alliance Pilot Ace
MonJanu Tornika (Master Commando / Master Bounty Hunter)
{ Beta Tester } [ Shuttle 2 ][ Pub9 ][ JTL ][CU][ RoW ][ToOW]
[ Jedi Unlocked 02/01/2004 (No Holos Used)]

TremorArchayen
Tue Dec 02, 2003 11:17 am
#162

Awesome awesome changes.



Finally these uber dood Imps will no longer be able to farm krayts.


Thank you Devs!




------------------------------------FOSHO---------------------------------
disch
Tue Dec 02, 2003 11:19 am
#163

If that goes live. Make them cheaper. They are no longer the virtually not killable machines able to use in any situation be it pvp or pve. The lower useablity (gcw basically) together with the weaknesses (they can be even easier dispatched by the right profession(s) now) no longer make them worth that much faction points. People like me dont feel happy about his 18900fps toy to be an unhealable toy that takes a week grinding or longer to replace and can be killed in a minute.
hasibert
Tue Dec 02, 2003 11:21 am
#164






Thunderheart wrote:





novafluxx wrote:





Loic wrote:
Thunderheart,

Are there any long term plans to remove the AT-ST as pet all together and implement them as Player Driven vehicles?

In my opinion, this would be much more fun, and I think Imperial players would get a kick out of blowing Rebels off their speeders. Just a thought, vehicle combat would be really fun.




Amen!





In time, thats the plan, but there are other things to get done first.


Ill be back to go through this thread some more later today, but the team is swamped getting the vehicle publish polished up at the moment...





cool idea, but if you do that you should give the rebels something too, the rebels don't have this powerful vehicles in the films, but they have some...so you can givethem something too




Character Names:

Janom Mosak on Gorath | Eve'line Mosak on Starsider

SWG :: Database |[The German SWG Fanpage]|
JeekElemental
Tue Dec 02, 2003 11:25 am
#165

I looked forward to hearing your feedback.



Here i is. Your a moron. The developers are morons. Its been said time and time again what the problem is and like idiots you skip over it. Thanks. Moron.


JeekElem





JeekElem of the Eternal Empire
"No one expects the Bothan Inquisition"


Reemul of the Eternal Empire
"Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the lightsaber"



Spasmolytic
Tue Dec 02, 2003 11:35 am
#166



GrandMufTartkin wrote:

Shame on you people. Stop with the spin.

You sit there and cry that commandos chew up the at-st, and that is why you are mad, but the reality of it is you are really mad about not being able to solo frickin Krayt dragons and farm holocrons.

If you are going to complain, at least be honest with it. Just tell everyone you think that soloing creatures that where not meant to be solo'ed, and farming holocrons with the most powerful pet in the game that requires no certification is fair.

Just yell....

I want the most powerful pet in the game without spending any skill points so I can solo Krayts and farm holocrons!!

It is not fair that I wont be able to do that any more.

Ohh, and the AT-ST is a useless faction pet? What does that make the rebel troopers?

Everyone can now only pull out one faction pet. At least your ONE pet is 1000 times better than the rebels. Shut up and be thankful, bunch of greedy whiners.






Oh, so Imperials are the only ones that can solo Krayt dragons or farm Holocrons?

Two words: Graul Maulers.

And it's not like we need to have any serious type of tanks to farm the Holocrons -- we can get them off of doing faction missions.

Just because you think you know the real reason we're all upset does not mean that you're correct. Don't assume that every Imperial here is interested in the same things you are interested in. I'm willing to bet that over 50% of the people with AT-STs do not use them to farm Krayts or FS NPCs; in reality, most of us probably use them as a general combat aid, and more specifically faction missions.

I myself have only on 3 occassions used my AT-ST to "farm" Krayts, and I can tell you that if I didn't have the capabilities of a Master Commando, my AT-ST would have been destroyed several times over.



- Spasmolytic FED
"I am a cipher, wrapped in an enigma, smothered in secret sauce."
"Here are the cliff notes so far: Bang head into wall. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. That aching you feel is the cliff notes." -- Grodd

Cyva
Tue Dec 02, 2003 11:37 am
#167

(1) I agree with taking away the ability to use 3 faction pets at once.


(2) There should be bonuses in Squad Leader that allow them to use more faction pets just as Creature Handlers get bonuses allowing them to use more creatures.


(3) If faction pets are limited to pvp only they should have permanent death removed and be able to be healed when not engaged in combat. Currently, most are unwilling to risk an AT-ST in pvp because the risk of doing so far outweighs the reward.


(4) Making faction pets pvp-only could cause hardship to many who are not Creature Handlers since creature handlers often stick to soloing or just take one or two people with them and leave everyone else with no options for damage-absorbers.


(5) I see no reason why total number of faction pets a player can have in their datapad should decrease. The ability to have more out at once is the real issue.


(6) It would be interesting to try improving something to balance it rather than nerfing the other thing involved.


(7) A realistic reason why faction pets would engage in pve: Doing so aids in the training of troops and the acquisition of resources to aid in the war effort. The quality of training and equipment provided to an army directly affects their chances of victory. If a soldier observes theirleader being attacked, they will join the battle to save their comrade even if the attackers were not designated by command as targets.

LoRez
Tue Dec 02, 2003 11:37 am
#168

Imps are the biggest bunch of whiners I've ever laid eyes on. You lost your uber Krayt Farming device. You can't intimidate a group of Overt Rebels who are on foot any more. BOOO HOOO. Not every rebel group or guild has a flame IV commando around at all times. And with the upcoming CH change there won't be as many players commanding (at the moment) decent pets like GSP. So yeah a commando will be able to put your AT ST in a hurt locker, but without high lvl CH skills, what's he going to tank your AT with? Nothing. Your AT will be hitting him in the face and melting through his super expensive (but lets be honest, nearly worthless) composite armor before he can even get a shot off.

The Imps don't want things to be balanced and even and fun. They want to stomp all over the galaxy with their Uber killing machines, camping Krayts and looking for TEF'd rebels. They want to be all powerful, and any time you make them on a lvl playing field with us, they whine. Guess what IMPS? You can be a commando too. So what do we have to compare to an AT ST ? Graul Mauler? That requires fairly high lvl CH skills. We have nothing you don't have. Just because your commandos don't have AT ST's to shoot at doesn't make ours any more special.

And for the record AT-ST's are not remote-controlled robots. They're driven by a person who is presumably killed by the flame damage.



----------------------------
MBH/MPistoleer Ahazi
Utan
Tue Dec 02, 2003 11:44 am
#169

Thunderheart,




With the changes being impliment to at-st's, is cost going to be reduced? If so, will those that have current at-st's be able to turn them in for a refund at the cost they paid for?




Otrilot
Wookie


Dark Legion Survivor
Page 13 of 83