Dancer Archive

---

Oqua wrote:

*hugs her friends *

Awww...ya'll are so sweet to me.

*steals more hugs from Roberto, Cristine, and Fuschia*

Oh Phoenix sugar, if that "she's a dude" in reference to me....

*looks down and double checks*

Nope, bodacious taa taa's still there *light squeeze*, that andbeing a dude wouldbe news to my uterus as well as my fiance Taewyn. *deep blush*

So miss wanna be thang,

Sorry to burst your bubble.

Ooooo...rather apropo too, given the original title of the thread. *covers her mouth and giggles* And that time I wasn't even trying to be sarcastic to you Phoenix sugar...you just bring it out in me I guess.

*winks with the sweetestofsmiles*

---

Did I need to know that you squeeze your man boobs at your computer screen? Too much information. The uterus info also falls under too much information. Your life partner doesn't know, too much information. Sarcasm doesn't come off well on the internet considering I can see you and all, it's just text to go off of and well...you sound like a. Nevermind.

I don't know you so I still don't know why you care to prove your gender to me. I won't believe it, that's how it goes on the internet. Can't trust someone I don't know "sugar". Dolly Parton says that, he's pretty famous though.

Oqua,we can do a tiny thankyou to him for 1 thing, and this is raisingour post count , although like Fuch. said, the sanity level dropped though, guesswe can't win on everything, but hey we can try.

Message Edited by Mr_pepsi on 08-02-2004 10:01 PM

Haha true true, course we lost morebecause of this thread. This post will most likely not last much longer anyway.

Message Edited by Mr_pepsi on 08-03-2004 01:16 AM

---

SakeO wrote:

Wow, interesting read.

My opinions on buff-bots aside, Pheonixstar should quit the debate now. Altering a necro postto accuse someone of being gay, a new low.

SakeO

---

---

PhoenixStar wrote:

I'm almost amused by the fact that people who agree with this are acting high and mighty as if the people who do not agree are wrong and in some cases bad for being against this change.

Drop the holy hero act, it doesn't apply. People who do not agree with this are not wrong, and people who do agree are not right. There is no right or wrong and we're all entitled to our opinions. I think this won't change a thing and personally this game made me appreciate macros when I used to hate them and I even asked the devs to remove them in the beginning. So the devs making a change like this now in my eyes seems pretty wrong, but in the end it's their decision. I'm going to make my voice heard just like all of you, and I will continue to post my opinions just as you do.

What I'm seeing right now is a couple of people who agree trying to shut out those who don't agree so it sounds as if everyone here is in agreement. I don't back down from flames and flames are coming from both sides myself included. The more people try to shut out those who do not agree, the louder I'll get until both sides of the argument are heard and something we can all agree on occurs. Quick fixes do not fix anything and since this hasn't even had time to register with many, it's definately a quick fix. If it's such a good idea I'm sure they could wait and hear opinions from many before dumping it on us.

---

/agree

---

SakeO wrote:

Wow, interesting read.

My opinions on buff-bots aside, Pheonixstar should quit the debate now. Altering a necro postto accuse someone of being gay, a new low.

SakeO

---

There was a debate? How come I'm always the last to know?

---

Taewyn wrote:

Removing macros will NOT kill the buff bots. Even Thunderheart knows it, he mentioned it in his post. You may win this battle but ultimately you will lose the war.

It will kill those buff bots who play by the EULA...The only real work around will be a timer delay (not hard to defeat, all the devs have to do isadd a max delay of lets say ten minutes) or through 3rd party programs. Which, if used in public (where this problem festers), will cause the person to be banned...

Message Edited by Taewyn on 08-02-2004 11:16 AM

---

Wrong.

And the original poster was correct.