Dancer Archive
Thread: yet another plea to stop afk macroing and buffbots
Message Edited by Schardour on 06-17-2004 05:32 PM
SharKaNis wrote:
The only way to beat this would be to remove the group-system for buffing I think. /setperform on a target cannot be macro'd without a 2nd-party programme, and so ends the problem. You could lose the auto-join function, but chances are that would be difficult.
Sadly, you are just wrong. There are many ways to construct a buff-bot. The easiest, and most common ones /auto-join or use /join and /disband. But they don't have to. I've seen *many* subscription buff-bots now (they use /invite nameofperson) to group people on their subscription list and I can think of a trivial way to do the same thing using /setperform right off the top of my head.
GarVa
SWG Community Relations Representative
Yep, my solution still stands as well. What was it you say?? Sure I'll repeat it!! ![]()
The main arguement isn't about macroing itself. It's about macroing WHILE afk. SO the solution is very simple, at least in my eyes. Fix the AFK timeout time. Say 15 minutes. Remove the ability for players to not go AFK using the Options interface. Then, after 15 minutes of inactive play (no inputs from the keyboard or mouse), the user goes AFK. Once the user is flagged AFK, DUMP ALL RUNNING MACROS. Dancers will still be dancing, and so will still heal mind wounds and BF, but it stops dancers and musicans from buffing, it stops other professions from AFK grinding, it stops those annoying AFK spam botters, and it stops those cheapass AFK macro looters.
This DOESN'T get rid of the Macroing functionality. It just keeps it where it belongs: with the ATK players.
PLEASE someone tell me what's wrong with this solution so we can find a way to refine it. The only thing I can see is that 3rd party macro programs will be used more. News flash! They're already used, but it'll be easier to nail the people that use them since if they're AFK and still doing stuff, there's only one way they can be doing that, and that's illegally.
Comments please ![]()