Creature Handler Archive
Thread: Creature Handler Issue/Request List (Sept. 2004 Revision)
Nice touch Tiggs ![]()
My thoughts, if anyone cares...
Re: 1. Difficulty could vary depending upon design, from the need to publish new models for the 'baby', etc variants to the adult. need for datapad icons, etc (not that they all work perfectly at this point even).
2. my guess is this ties into what we've been told about CH being 'ahead of' the combat rebalance. If I was a prophet, I'd tell stories of the coming reduction in doc buff and armor effectiveness, and their effects upon tanking abilities amongst the population.
3. yup. enable usage of droid "datapads" with pets, workable solution.
8. flying is the only one that will make sense, and it'd compete to a degree with the BH jetpack. Suggest limited-use pet schematic.
11. You'll kill an already low BE pet demand with that change. A solution might be to really provide some more desirable traits (specials?) in each creature, but make only certain configurations of these traits available in the wild. Then let BE's combine them when CH's desire a particular configuration. This is sort of hinted at as the model of the current system, but the traits are either too interchangable in usefulness or too hard for the BE to recombine (finding an excellent CL 35 recipie and then being asked to reinvent the wheel just to change specials is a common request and rediculously difficult problem--maybe allow BE to choose specials somehow? non-standard crafting though). Short answer--no simple solution within current game design.
14. I have to disagree. I hate the delay too, but look at it this way. Pets are as close to weapons as they can be, with a great big difference--they are defensive as well as offensive. Instant calls mean that if you get a momentary break during a pvp fight (often happens to me during raids) you can call another pet and replentish your "party's" defensive power at no cost--something no other profession gets to do.
15, 25, 27, 28. sorry to spam, but YES YES YES ![]()
36. This is right after the rest of my needs, it would be a very very nice touch. suggest assuming the targetted object is the pet in question and go from there.
While I'd like to continue as a correspondent as I enjoy working with the members of the various communities and the developers, the community needs an advocate that will be able to stick through till their revamp. As it seems that won't be till next year, I will not be able to fill that need for my community when it will most likely need that voice.