Creature Handler Archive
Thread: 19 Questions Suggestion Thread
Page 4 of 4
Ragemaster9999
Wed Jun 16, 2004 8:52 am
#40
Heres my question:
Is there any plans to add a "cat type" mount to the game? This will allow CH mounts to compete with vehicles, whereas currently only the poorest of poorest use mounts due to the fact that vehicles are simply cheap to maintain and go alot faster than mounts.
Is there any plans to add a "cat type" mount to the game? This will allow CH mounts to compete with vehicles, whereas currently only the poorest of poorest use mounts due to the fact that vehicles are simply cheap to maintain and go alot faster than mounts.
SkyPreacher1
Wed Jun 16, 2004 9:20 am
#41
Skypreacher stares morosely into his crystal ball.
"Stupid thing isn't working" Gives it a good shake. "Hmmmm it's clearing, I see a face. TH it's TH in there. Oh his lips are moving. I can just make it out. yyyyyyoooooouuuuuuu wwwwwiiiiiiiillllllll nnnnnnooooooooooooootttttt ggggggeeeeeeeeeetttttttttt aaaaaaaaaaaannnnnnyyyyyyy aaaaannnnnssssswwwweeeeerrrrrrrrr yyyyyyyoooooouuuuuuu cccccccaaaaaannnnnn uuuuuunnnnnddddddeeeerrrrrsssstttttaaaannnndddd." (for the first time TH tells the truth, skypreacher falls in a dead faint)
Skypreacher throws crystal ball up in air, fast draws his flame thrower and burns it on it's way down. Meanwhile his pet has autostored, his mount continues to drool and the rest of SWG community walks away laughing once again at the pathetic state of CH.
taloncard
Wed Jun 16, 2004 9:49 am
#42
PoilDeCarotte wrote:
ratlif wrote:2. Any chance of increasing the CL level for masters to above 70. BEs can't make decent lvl 23 pets so calling 3 pets is pointless when they die so quickly because of their current stats.Agree with this. This would be my question... if not asked yet.
Hate to say it but we asked a while ago and the answer was a resounding NO!. They lowered it to that and it was gonna be lowered to 60 untill we screamed Unfair, Their solution to that and the 3 pets was to raise the CL of our best tanks so that we could only call 2 anyway.
VoodooVelvet
Wed Jun 16, 2004 10:24 am
#43
That's an awsome idea!
Add CH quests that reward us with "eggs" which can be hatched giving a random pet. Random meaning pets that normally can not be caught.
Vertexon
Wed Jun 16, 2004 2:29 pm
#44
Okay, let's go with pet incapacitation recovery for this week then. Thanks everyone. 
marxo777
Wed Jun 16, 2004 2:45 pm
#45
Vertexon wrote:
Okay, let's go with pet incapacitation recovery for this week then. Thanks everyone.
Cool.
Lamarak1234
Wed Jun 16, 2004 3:06 pm
#46
heh too late but the autostore bug is a sure pain. can you imagain a rifleman having his rifle poof in the middle of combat? Why should we have to deal with it?
marxo777
Wed Jun 16, 2004 3:12 pm
#47
They have told us its fixed before. I don't think they know how to really fix it yet or it would be.
Matsubaa
Thu Jun 17, 2004 12:43 am
#48
Vertexon wrote:
marxo777 wrote:
Sounds fine with me.
Personally I'd rather know if Frenzied Grauls and other creatures that are tagged as tameable truly are but no biggie.
We could do that instead, if that's of more interest. We can't give them a huge list of things to check, but perhaps a couple. Frenzied Graul, Crazed Gurk Destroyer, and Swift Charging Bol seem to be popular ones (the latter of which would provide confirmation for lair bosses, too).
I don't like this question based on it being so specific. It won't get answered, TH seems to have a really hard time giving straightforward answers to specific questions.
To get the same effect we could just ask "When are you going to finish with Publish 5 and bring in the new babies?"
Page 4 of 4