Creature Handler Archive
Thread: PvP notes: CH and the stackers, and CH defensive bonuses (makes sense! please read)
Page 2 of 2
FireFists
Fri Jul 09, 2004 3:27 pm
#14
Just gota say that i agree with u
CH are almost useless in PvP, cos players become 5x mre powerful with buffs, but creatures dont 
sada
Mon Jul 12, 2004 8:04 pm
#17
Heh make buffs percentage based and see who is useless in pvp
. Anyways, Rangers should definitely get a higher bonus than creature handler if this gets implemented. Maybe some of the interesting ranger resistance bonuses should apply to a much lesser degree to creature handler. Considering they both deal with the same thing (One handles, One kills). Of course not the combat related bonuses but the resists. Come on devs it's not artwork, just a few mods. The time spent leveling creature handler should be enough to develop those resistances lol. Being bitten, poisoned, nearly death blown, having our pets just vanish, not to mention the verbal resistances we should get for being able to handle tortons, kimos, etc. (lol damn, people get mad easily. As soon as you take a large pet out, you could be a hundred meters away, you start getting rude tells). I am in favor of this as a bandaid style upgrade. Though it really has nothing to do with your creatures, maybe instead of us having it they (Your creatures) should. Just a thought.
theGauch0
Wed Jul 14, 2004 10:49 am
#18
I don't think giving the resists to creatures would make much of an impact on anything. Better to give it to the handlers (and the rangers). I do think, though, that creatures that deal poison or disease should be somewhat resistant to those attacks. I have no idea if this is already the case to any extent.
theGauch0
Sat Sep 04, 2004 5:37 pm
#19
/bump
This seems like an idea that could be patched in pretty easily if it got some consensus from the community. Anybody have any other thoughts on this?
Wallach1
Sat Sep 04, 2004 8:11 pm
#20
theGauch0 wrote:
I don't think giving the resists to creatures would make much of an impact on anything. Better to give it to the handlers (and the rangers). I do think, though, that creatures that deal poison or disease should be somewhat resistant to those attacks. I have no idea if this is already the case to any extent.
I think they were meaning the creature handler, but I will say this much, if a creature deals out strong poison or strong desease, they should be immune to strong poison and strong desease. my 2c
Page 2 of 2