Creature Handler Archive
Thread: Special Mount Poll
=SIVART SMADA= 
-Elder Medic-
Sammywhammy
Mon Nov 01, 2004 6:21 pm
#171
peko peko!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
peko peko!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
peko peko!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
peko peko!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
peko peko!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
peko peko!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
peko peko!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
peko peko!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
peko peko!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
peko peko!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
peko peko!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
peko peko!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
peko peko!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
peko peko!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
peko peko!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
peko peko!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
peko peko!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
CritterControl
Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:50 am
#173
fliers should be CH and Cats should be Master CH only. bugs, tybis, gualama, bordok, ect 
should include non-CH
should include non-CH
Iakimo
Tue Nov 02, 2004 10:49 am
#174
I think a multi-tiered system would be very cool, and based on what I'm reading, that seems to be the consensus.
Here's my two credits' worth...
1. I'd up the max level for non-creature-handlers' pets to 20, perhaps attainable whenever a player has reached level 4 in one of his skills. At that point, the ability to upgrade from one level-ten pet to one level-20 pet would make sense for a couple of reasons. First, it would enhance the market for midlevel pets. Second, it would enable players to enjoy pets that were comparable to combat droids in HAM and other stats. Besides, I think everyone should have the experience of riding a dewback or bantha at least once in his life.
2. I agree that exotic mounts should be restricted to Creature Handlers. I salivate at the thought of having a Peko Peko as a mount... perhaps a giant Peko Peko...? Or a Mantigrue Night Stalker... or a Grand Wrix or Greater Sludge Panther.... Or for Master Creature Handlers, perhaps a Great Plains Stalker orReptilian Flierallowing the player tokeep up with a target trying to flee on one of those fancy-pants new speeders for a short distance? and maybe even unseat the rider? And if you really want to get exotic, perhaps a Force-Sensitive character could use his Persuasion skills to tame and mount-train even the most obdurate creatures, a la Anakin Skywalker's taming of the gladiatorial creatures in Star Wars, Episode II? (Yes, even a rancor!)
3. I also think large pets (fambaas, tortons, kimos, etc.) should be trainable as pack animals. The bigger the pet, the bigger and more elaborate the possibilities, from simple saddlepacks for small mountable pets like carrion spats or dewbacks, to battle platforms that can carry up to four players for huge pets. I can just picture a ravenous torton with four players up top stomping into battle... or maybe it could carry two players, one the driver (the creature handler) and the other a Commando manning a heavy-weapon turret...
psycocat
Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:07 am
#175
Plageron wrote:
If i have to choose one...I cannot choose one...maybe I am biased..oh well.
I agree with this guy. THere are so many animals that would make excellent pets.
Odro
Thu Nov 25, 2004 7:03 pm
#177
A) for sure so I can sell them and make a profit. It would also be good since they are cheaper for noobs who can not buy a vehicle.
Ithilkir
Fri Nov 26, 2004 6:52 am
#178
Ooooooooh.... I'd love a mountable Reptillian flyer or a rancor, but a 'special' mount would have to be CH only. While we do have some CH only mounts that BE's can't make (Wasteland Cupa, Savage Humbaba and Giant Carrion Spat for example) I don't think there's enough of a difference between them and a regular non CH mount. There's not really that much incentive to get beyond CL50 worth of taming, a reward at master would be great and be something to show off your hard work 
If I could, I'd be harded pressed to pick from the following three (CL60-70's )
1. Mountable Reptillian Flyer
2. Mountable Rancor
3. A 'multiplayer' Makloc/Fambaa with a howdah that could accomodate upto four players including the CH, naturally only the CH would be able to control it.
If I could, I'd be harded pressed to pick from the following three (CL60-70's
)1. Mountable Reptillian Flyer
2. Mountable Rancor
3. A 'multiplayer' Makloc/Fambaa with a howdah that could accomodate upto four players including the CH, naturally only the CH would be able to control it.
darkstar860
Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:00 am
#180
Wow I didnt realize there were this many CH's left around these days
One mount I would like to see would be the coolest yet - the flying thing in
episode II that Obi-wan rode on Kimino. Make it MCH only to keep it rare.
I agree more mounts would keep us CH's occupied for a couple of more
paymen, uh, months but I'd like to see new creatures period - and a new
habitate or two. Like most of you I've been everywhere and seen everything.
all i hear from my friends and guildes when I sign on is the same thing - Im bored.
People play games to combat bordom - As Han Solo would say, I have a bad feeling
about this. So if anyone is listening more content sooner than later would be a good thing.
I work for a living so I don't have time for a cool, color coded signature
sharde64
Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:58 am
#181
i would say for a MCH as then it would make us usefull for scouting and especially iff it ignored the terrian like flying higher or just going same speed up hills as flat land
Magnetmojo
Fri Nov 26, 2004 1:56 pm
#182
They should have rancors mountable by only mch, jedi knight 2/3 had mountable rancors 