Creature Handler Archive
Thread: Petition: MASTER CH'S WANT ALL CREATURES UNDER 70 TAMABLE
/sign
How sweet it would be to have a 70k ham blurrg raptor 
Thunderheart wrote:
Vertexon had mentioned this to me. At this time I'm not going to assume that they are truly extinct, but I will speak work with the producers to find out if anything might be wrong. If it is simply a matter of these creatures spawning too rarely, Ill see if anything can be done.
TH,
Thanks.
While you're at it, you need to have the devs look at the formula for calculating the CL of a pet.
The whole reason for the last patch to CH's was to eliminate "dabblers" no? But low-cl "uber" BE'd clone pets has revived the "dabbling" problem to some degree.
And on last thing - ever since the changes to CH made our ability to call pet based on the CL, shouldn't we be able to see the CL of pets when we /examine it?
Thanks again.
I dont see why you can turn "on" babies for every creature in the game...
the level will dictate whether we can use it or not.
Why shouldn't every creature have babies?
TivoTenook wrote:
I have had it up to here (points to the sky) with the ridiculous fact that there are undeniablly no babies for the following species, and we want them back (some never had babies but definately should):
- frenzied graul
There is no reason why these creatures should not be spawning babies and I'm sick of it. WE DEMAND THESE CREATURES BACK RIGHT NOW. This is not about the debate between BEs and CHs, this is the plain and simple fact that these creatures SHOULD be spawning babies.
ughhhhh...... Welll I have seen a frenzied baby. But since I was just out killing things for carnivore meat it got roasted along with the other grauls in the area. Looks like I should ahve looked for CHs more then I did. Told my guild but only 4 CHs total in my guild and noe could tame it or showed any intrest. I have been hunting on Dantoonie for about 3 monthes, so I've spent a lot of time seeing Grauls of all types but that was the only frenzied baby.
As for the Thune Herd Leader I think you're smoking crack. Herd Leaders get that way by beating out the compition, or by being the oldest. So they should not spawn babies since there is no way that you can tell when a baby elephant, wolf, etc. will be the leader of it's group in the future. Now insects are diffrent so the king/queen babies I have no problem with. Some like Bull Rancors shouldn't be rare. If baby Bull rancors were so rare then the entire species would have become extinct.
LOLYalton...
I never took the names of the creatures that literally before.
Why should they be spawning babies? That single list is MORE than the number of droids a DE can make.
TivoTenook wrote:
This is not about the debate between BEs and CHs, this is the plain and simple fact that these creatures SHOULD be spawning babies.
CavemanGamer wrote:
I dont see why you can turn "on" babies for every creature in the game...
the level will dictate whether we can use it or not.
Why shouldn't every creature have babies?
Why can't we have droidekas and IG-88s?
My god Ackis, nobody is making value judgements about pets versus droids.
Go troll somewhere else.
CavemanGamer wrote:
My god Ackis, nobody is making value judgements about pets versus droids.
Go troll somewhere else.
"Why should they be spawning babies? That single list is MORE than the number of droids a DE can make."
TivoTenook wrote:
This is not about the debate between BEs and CHs, this is the plain and simple fact that these creatures SHOULD be spawning babies.
Please take your trolling back to your own forums, thanks.
On a lighter note, thanks Thunderheart. I can guarantee those pets are as extinct as can be, or else you made them so rare that nobody has found one in two months, and with the dedicated people we have on this forum I'm sure they would have been located by now.
Message Edited by Ko-aIri on 02-10-2004 12:01 PM
Yes this game needs more uber pets. /sign
I want to see 100% resists on everythign with AR3 pets. Get them in game now! Time for CH to take back its role as GOD