Creature Handler Archive
Thread: Offensive pet name or what?
Message Edited by Xorcist2k3 on 05-18-2004 09:17 AM
SioBabble wrote:
The CSRs seem to be exceptionally skittish about drug references.
Message Edited by GTOfire on 05-18-2004 06:30 PM
GTOfire wrote:
the limitations are insanely broad, so much more then what is commonly accepted as offensive. I'm lucky I'm accustomed to British english so I can swear all I want, since they don't filter out 'buggar', 'sod off' or 'bleedin' ', which has pretty much EXACTLY the same intention as the common American terms that are always bleeped out.
Goat, a "trick" is a service provided by a prostitute. They are said to be "turning tricks" when they are working.
I'm going to guess the edit was for ch!nk, which is a racial slur against Chinese people, yet also refers to a small chunk taken out of something, or a dent, such as a ch!nk in your armor.
I know someone whose petN!p (with partner Tuck) was changed since N!p is a slur against the Japanese. Not to mention that's what animals DO is n!p, of course . . . . *shrugs*
~~The Secondhand Lion
Message Edited by BlindTyldak on 05-18-2004 11:15 AM
Message Edited by marxo777 on 05-18-2004 11:00 AM
Hey, wow looks like pokemon is off the censor list. I found it funny that christmass gets the christ part bleeped out.
I've also seen a number of NPCs that have part of thier name sensored. Too funny.
Galacium wrote:
Hey, wow looks like pokemon is off the censor list. I found it funny that christmass gets the christ part bleeped out.
I've also seen a number of NPCs that have part of thier name sensored. Too funny.
hehe, yeah i found that out
Hey, when it comes to those, doesn't that possibly run in to the "World of StarWarsCharacter Names" junk? You know, like not being able to call your pet "Luke".
Or is there a filter in place, in case someone else's pet already has that name?