Combat Medic Archive
Thread: Horray for 9.3.... Great work by the Dev's
BobDigi wrote:
how about just remove the profession from the game its stupid sense when did a poison do more damage than a bullet in the ass? just remove the damn thing people r only this profession cuz its broken i mean what can possibly be fun about throwing a ball in the air then watch large blue numbers fly up from everyone infront of u?
Current nerve gas agents not only have a chance of killing you faster AND doing more damage than a bullet they also have a greater chance of killing you than a bullet since they are tailored to destroy specifics of our bodies. ***Geez, there's a 97% chance that if you're infected with the ebola virus (disease) you're going to die. There's a 60% chance that inhaling old fashioned Mustard gas will leave permanent lung damage. There's a 90% chance that more than 5cc's of real mercury introduced into your system at one time will kill you. With the number of places a bullet can strike you anywhere on your body the chances of actually dying are much more smaller. There's a reason why we trained so hard in Iraq 1 and 2 in chemical and biological warfare countermeasures and it sure wasn't to look pretty in those hot and insulated BioHazMat suits.
Now tell me why melee such high defense modifiers vs. a ranged weapon? Let me think....NEVER! Hell gunpowder signaled the end of the every melee profession's dominance on the battlefield on every continent. To this day the closest thing to an effective modern daymelee weapon is a bayonet....well the entrenchment tool back in Vietnam worked nice after you ran out of ammo according to my dad. 
***Disclaimer: All info is subject to differing doctor opinions and textbooks. Feel free to post any corrections or differences according to another medical source.
Message Edited by Brainplay on 08-17-2004 05:53 AM
BobDigi wrote:
ok ill shoot you in the head with a desert eagle and you can throw frogs at me and we will see who dies faster
According to this game Pistoleers can't shoot anyone in the head unless they are also a Bounty Hunter.
Anyway if you want to stick to comparing in-game scenarios with real life mechanics then I challenge you to drink a cup of Drano and I will shoot a single bullet into your stomach. Let's see which kills you faster
BobDigi wrote:
ok ill shoot you in the head with a desert eagle and you can throw frogs at me and we will see who dies faster
Never thoughof it that way. That proves the point. bullets are tougher then frogs. What are we thinking? lets petition the devs to get rid of the frogs. Since you don't disagree that poisons are tougher then bullets (in the ass), we'll keep the CMs in the game but damn those frogs... they don't do anything when thrown.
Mmaxx wrote:
BobDigi wrote:
ok ill shoot you in the head with a desert eagle and you can throw frogs at me and we will see who dies faster
Never thoughof it that way. That proves the point. bullets are tougher then frogs. What are we thinking? lets petition the devs to get rid of the frogs. Since you don't disagree that poisons are tougher then bullets (in the ass), we'll keep the CMs in the game but damn those frogs... they don't do anything when thrown.
BobDigi wrote:
ok ill shoot you in the head with a desert eagle and you can throw frogs at me and we will see who dies faster
Kevlar helmet with the lining will stop a .357magnum round as will any of the new ballistic vests. Counter-Strike is a poor substitute for real ballistics knowledge. Only in that game will a pistol be more powerful than a rifle. And while the DEagle is fun to shoot, its heavy as sin andnot funto aim with that HUGE non egonomic group. Friend of mine had to get some custom Pacmyer woods before he was happy shooting it.
Mild-Breeze-Trooper wrote:
Mmaxx wrote:
Mmaxx wrote:
BobDigi wrote:
ok ill shoot you in the head with a desert eagle and you can throw frogs at me and we will see who dies faster
Never thoughof it that way. That proves the point. bullets are tougher then frogs. What are we thinking? lets petition the devs to get rid of the frogs. Since you don't disagree that poisons are tougher then bullets (in the ass), we'll keep the CMs in the game but damn those frogs... they don't do anything when thrown.
Sorry but I forgot to mention thebetter sentence use this time around. Much easier to read.
thanks
Messing up when all you have is one sentence is pretty hard unless yoda you are. But you should note the lack of punctuation and the the lack of capitalization which in turns his post from a sentence into a random sting of words that just happened to make sense. I'ts like withthe apes and Shakespear I'd wager.
Read thepost that started the whole ass shot / frog throwing debate and you'll notice a dramatic improvement in communication abilities.
Mmaxx wrote:
Read thepost that started the whole ass shot / frog throwing debate and you'll notice a dramatic improvement in communication abilities.
Well... you are right, of course. But I notice he actually used interpunctuation in the original post. At least he has mastered the questionmark. Great power sense in this one I do.
BobDigi wrote:
how about just remove the profession from the game its stupid sense when did a poison do more damage than a bullet in the ass? just remove the damn thing people r only this profession cuz its broken i mean what can possibly be fun about throwing a ball in the air then watch large blue numbers fly up from everyone infront of u?
lol
BobDigi wrote:
ok ill shoot you in the head with a desert eagle and you can throw frogs at me and we will see who dies faster
ok, i held my fire for several posts, lol, but this is a bit much!
i will simply say this:
you said "a bullet in the ass," then you want to put a desert eagle to your head...
anyone see the irony here?
then, i doubt you could hit me with your desert eagle from as far as i could throw a glowing ball, and i can't throw worth a damn.
and, if you get a desert eagle, i get green-ring III, which will cause you to die before you get the slide back to chamber a round to begin with.
of course, i must temper this with the thought that either
1. u r stoopuud
or
2. u r a troll
Message Edited by neutrineaux on 08-18-2004 01:11 PM
BobDigi wrote:
ok ill shoot you in the head with a desert eagle and you can throw frogs at me and we will see who dies faster
Ooh... tough guy, wanna play rough.
You can't change the premises in the middle of the game. Frogs will still kill you, without needing to be thrown. But if it makes you happier I can rub their gunk on an arrow and shoot you with it. Bullets will only kill me at specific locations (on of which, i might add, the ass is not), poison will kill you without the bothersome aiming.
If you want to change the rules, I serve you a poisoned drink before our little game, see if you live long enough to pull that trigger.
You're skating on ice so think you're practically Jesus. Just realize you made a fool out of yourself and be gracious enough to shut the hell up and fade away.
Edit: Damn you Gnuut, you beat me to it.
Message Edited by Mild-Breeze-Trooper on 08-18-2004 09:25 AM
FallenLore wrote:
Neutrineaux, whats with the one line posts? You quote the whole message, which could be a few paragraphs, and leave something stupid like lol or something.
You were prob one of the folks screaming at otherfolks that CM's weren't going to be nerfed huh?
Message Edited by FallenLore on 08-18-2004 12:03 PM
nope
neutrineaux wrote:
FallenLore wrote:
Neutrineaux, whats with the one line posts? You quote the whole message, which could be a few paragraphs, and leave something stupid like lol or something.
You were prob one of the folks screaming at otherfolks that CM's weren't going to be nerfed huh?
Message Edited by FallenLore on 08-18-2004 12:03 PM
oh, sorry, forgot to answer the first part...
if you don't quote the message, often the response is not clearly associated with that which prompted it. personally, i find it much easier to follow someone's point if the original post is referenced. so i try to do that every time, even if i just express my amusement at a particular post with a very brief sentiment.
whether you find my remark stupid or not, it is the product of years of contemplation and market research, funded with large top-secret government grants, and conducted in area-51, which "does not exist." it is designed to provide toxic karmic dys-resonance to trolls who read it, thus dooming them to continue their angst-ridden excuse for a life.
nope