Combat Medic Archive
Thread: Necro-Posting is Bad
Page 2 of 2
Pappi
Tue Dec 07, 2004 2:08 pm
#14
Brainplay wrote:/sighI just can't figure out peoples obsessions with post counts. Its like the higher the number the more people they think will take them seriously or their d*** will get bigger./checks hawtpantsI'll put money down say these dudes didn't just necro this forum.
GAT is for postcount. some people swear by it
:has no "d***" to worry about
vortexala wrote:
imperial_pawn wrote:just when you think you have you're forum vocabulary tuned up you run into something like this...necro-posting??It's a term someone coined back on the pre-beta forums. Hadn't heard it before then or seen it used anywhere else. It's a SWG originalAnd yep, like Pappi said, it's bringing an old post back from the depths of the forums.
hrm, I thought it was pretty common.
Pappi
Thu Dec 09, 2004 3:37 pm
#15
SkittyDude wrote:/noob on..........sorry...but what is necro-posting?
basically, posting in really old posts, usually to bump it.
look up a bit, we defined it somewhere in a post up there
nogoodnamesareleft
Thu Dec 09, 2004 5:11 pm
#16
shouldnt there be some kind of reasonable time limit on how long a post stays on the forums? ie, 6 months, something like that? I dont think that there is much need for posts older then that, unless they are the FAQor one of the stickies at the top, in witch case maybe there could be an exception made..
Pahdbacca
Thu Dec 09, 2004 9:10 pm
#17
A necromancer is a person that animates the dead...kinda brings them back from being dead.
Necroposting is bringing life to a thread (posting on it) that has been dead for a long time. (15 months in some of the cases in the last week)
Page 2 of 2