Cities And Housing Archive
Thread: Petition against Condemnation
Page 2 of 2
TJMaverick
Fri Jan 28, 2005 10:30 am
#14
Ceraphim wrote:
TJMaverick wrote:
OK, guys. The Dev's have made a big oopsie with the houses idea, maintenance and the condemnation of structures instead of deletion. I for one am not a Dev hater. I ama Dev Hater-Hater. If people have nothing better to do than flame the Dev's, stop playing the game.
BUT in this case I wonder where they are headed, so I ask where is the petition to sign against this? Please point me in the direction of a petition or if none exists, I will edit this post to be the petition. If we get an answer from the Dev's on how they will address the issues being raised, then fair enough. Until then, sign away!
Condemnation (according to JustG)is a step TOWARDS the purging (deletion)of inactive accounts. Do some research next time, these stupid petitions are just a waste of forum space.
And have you thought how constructive and a perfectly good use of forum space YOUR post is.
Mastodon
Fri Jan 28, 2005 2:25 pm
#15
Kilrtom-WookieCoat wrote:
Would you care to elaborate a bit on just how this would "bug" the cross server lot trades? As long as anyone who is on admin to any structure places maintenance in it, that structure will not go to condemmend state.
Already done lot trades will be affected just if you forget the maintenance. New trades, i'm sure the partners will banktip each other just in case.
/shrug so a valid question is again placed... why not sweep away every old lot thats unused from inactive accounts? Hate to say it, but it just might have a POSITIVE outcome for all servers doing this... why? Well, we have a lot of new players that come and see what SWG is all about. We have the CURB coming in the near future and with all the support staff and new devs they have recently added, I am willing to bet many good things happen to the game this year.
Cleanning the inactive accounts lots ,may affect the alreadytraded lots, , just agree a new one.
With that said, by removing all the old lots from inactive accounts, (yes, this should include lot trades as well...) it will make more room for new players... will allow old cities to rebuild and regain new momentum instead of dealing with cold reality that its a ghost town with many lots that could be used for new players...etc etc etc. So many benefits to thecommunity to do this!
Have you thought for a second if we are the same number of players than 6 months ago? Guess we are half of 'em or less.. mm, i'd agree a lot cleanning, i like to start things back again but i guess Devs have not same opinion, as aren't interested to let us realize of 'truth'.
I guess I just want to see a purge done because every now and then, we need a "fire" to cleanse these lands... it will only strengthen em over time and gives ppl hope and some excitement in the rebuilding process. Just my thoughts and reasoning why this should happen. It would be good for the economy and the player base.Agree but economy issue.. will fix a bit of it only, realize the only buildings standing without maintenance are/were the houses, so the harvesters you actually see still being maintained so... people just will drop 'em again.
Page 2 of 2