Carbineer Archive
Thread: Ok, new template help :)
KithSyn wrote:
TA,
There will always be prof stacking in the form of many templates for many purposes...even after the Combat Upgrade....
I understand that there will be a stacking of professions, but I'm not sure this answered the poster's question of defense stacking not being available anymore. I'm not sure myself, so I thought I would ask you.
Will a fencer, tkm, pikeman (for i.e.) be able to stack defenses as they can now?
I'd appreciate your thoughts.
I am always very careful in what I say....because of the always in effect NDA us Corrs have I can not say more.
wilibus wrote:
I don't think i have ever heard TA result to petty name calling. But you have to remember that it is his job to help educate people. If you have an opinion or guess you want to throw up then do just that. Don't take an opinion or what "seems to be" and come in and here and state it as a fact. All that will accomplish is confusing people. Also when TA tells you that you are wrong, don't read that much into it,likely it is because you were wrong, not because he doesn't like you because all that does is start flame wars.
jedimaster1141 wrote:
TAfirehawk, I know you're very knowledgeable about the carbineer profession, but when someone says something wrong, I think you need to be a little nicer about it instead of calling them stupid or dumb or whatever, and crying to the mods to have the thread deleted.
QFE
Perfectly said....
Naritus
OryakaDrake wrote:
"Hey ta, thanks for calling me an idiot... makes me fell like your a great person. I seriously thought that if you did that you went faster than speed cap, as right when they put this stuff out, my friend went from doing damage number X to doing a lot more than damage number x using all of the same weapons armor and everyhting(he had a free tree and learned it right there). So in all actuality i had a justification for my statements, and saying what you just did about how people make everything up.. even if it wasnt directed at me makes me fell as if it were.
I think you need to go to niceness school.... haha. There take that"
I think that statement right there that i made just about clarifies how serious i was in that post... while there was a little frustration i wasnt really being serious. However i seriously really thought it had been defined so far that FS speed at either form was a different set up from normal speed... obviously i was wrong. However the tone was a tiny bit unhappy from you but then again it is writing and not speech so it can be reguarded in any way possible. In that im sorry for my ignorance.... can you forgive me guys?
Oryaka Drake
Naritus
Master Carbineer/ Master Dabbler
"In the darkness of reality you will find me"
Founding Member: Birds of Prey -Prey-
It is a common mistake and even one I have complained about in the Corr Forum for the Jedi's to be pushing the "new" and very wrong FS Speed Formula around....so I was never holding anything against you in the first place, but I MUST correct false statements that are well proven in-game.
I use emphasis to get the attention of "others" reading the posts, not to offend you....some people (usually not the original poster) get all bent out of shape when they read things out of context. I am a real stickler on presenting facts as facts so people don't get false info.
The "regulars" are used to my presentation style which is blunt and to the point....for those new people that get offended, I am sorry, but my style isn't going to change. I am not long winded or fluffy in my posts, I have never been one to beat around the bush.
Trust me, if I was attacking you, it would be obvious even to the BLIND ![]()