Bounty Hunter Archive
Thread: Why not force jedis to follow the rules instead?
That's exactlymy point: Set some Jedi population degrees in some servers, so the ones who want to play with no jedi at all have their place, and so have the ones who want to play in a galaxy with very few, with average, with a lot or even an only-jedi server.
Look, doing it in stages of 10%would take only 11 servers, from 0 to 100. It´s just a matter of rearrangements. Problem is that now everything is tangled. How do you tell the jedis of a server to move to another because the one in which they are playing is gonna be turned into a non jedi environment?
The idea, set from the beginning, would have been a success.
My main point was if BH's want jedi defences (force defence for example)and so on, why not just go get there own lightsaber 
SuperStarwolf wrote:
That's exactlymy point: Set some Jedi population degrees in some servers, so the ones who want to play with no jedi at all have their place, and so have the ones who want to play in a galaxy with very few, with average, with a lot or even an only-jedi server.
Look, doing it in stages of 10%would take only 11 servers, from 0 to 100. It´s just a matter of rearrangements. Problem is that now everything is tangled. How do you tell the jedis of a server to move to another because the one in which they are playing is gonna be turned into a non jedi environment?
The idea, set from the beginning, would have been a success.
Yes, I'd have to agree again. Geez, keep this up and I'll end up being your pet lackey!
Too bad this didn't happen from Day 1.As it isnow, it would be a daunting task to ask (force?) all those players to move servers and leave their friends, guildmates, etc. behind.
SPY-DER wrote:
OMFG i had a TYPO end of the world
Lol its fun to read the BH forums and watch you all cry and complain.
LOL. A Jedi talking about others crying. My god the irony is thick. BTW, is there an overflow of tears on the Jedi forums that force all you trolls to come over here? Shouldnt you be crying about avoid incap having a timer or FR3 not helping you run fast enough?
Leatherneck_of_Alderaan wrote:
TheMadCoder wrote:
Again, there are people who suck on both sides, but I have heard no FACTS that a full template combatant will beat a full template defender 50% of the time, all things being equal.
Highly, highly doubtful. (this excludes "/offerride," "force run, "force cloak," house grinding," "house running, " "LOS exploits," and "Kashyyk /afk grinding," of course - These, of course, are reserved for the Jedi that don't stand to fight, so the numbers are surely HIGHLY screwed by this.)
BIG problem right there.
Not every full template is a defender. There are quite a few templates that have little to NO defender.
Yes, the Devs keep logs. Good ones at that. And THEY are the ones Tanks is reporting that feel that Jedi are close. That's my authority for citing. Where's yours?
Ummmm...
But that was the ENTIRE POINT of my post when I entered this horrendous thread:
***This wouldn't effect us against any other profession in the game, but would give most bounty hunters a chance again full template defenders...***
Again, there are lousy players and lousy templates, but don't tell me that full template defenders aren't the FOTM, full on, alpha, uber, 1.5x profession, because they sure as hell are.
Cada_Kai wrote:
aekeem wrote:
SPY-DER wrote:
+5 force defences per block ? your wanting more force defence then a master defender ? lol
you do speak english, right spy-der? dictionary.com is your friend for big words like irrelevant
TheMadCoder wrote:
(this numbers are irrelevent, but you get the general idea.)
Since you have to look for something to flame in every single post I thought I might point out that you are flaming the wrong person for not spelling correctly.
TheMadCoder made the spelling mistake not Spy-der.
If you are going to try and be the official forum spell checker then atleast get your target right before being an ass.
if you could comprehend what you read you'd notice the meaning of my post was not to point out the misspelling of irrelevant. i was pointing out that the numbers DIDN'T MATTER. hence the dictionary.com comment, suggesting maybe spy-der didn't understand the meaning of the word irrelevant. if someone misspells something i would recommend using the spell check included with the forums.
Hate leads to the dark side. Both sides BWM, so that's that. Not trying to put you down, but both sides have a near number of idiots and complainers (it's just thatmore trolls come here, for some odd reason.)
dezi wrote:
SPY-DER wrote:
OMFG i had a TYPO end of the world
Lol its fun to read the BH forums and watch you all cry and complain.
LOL. A Jedi talking about others crying. My god the irony is thick. BTW, is there an overflow of tears on the Jedi forums that force all you trolls to come over here? Shouldnt you be crying about avoid incap having a timer or FR3 not helping you run fast enough?
SPY-DER wrote:
OMFG i had a TYPO end of the world
Lol its fun to read the BH forums and watch you all cry and complain.
what are you talking about? your whole post is what i had a problem with, the guy clearly stated that the numbers he was using were IRRELEVANT, look it up if you don't understand the word.
TheMadCoder wrote:
Leatherneck_of_Alderaan wrote:
TheMadCoder wrote:
Again, there are people who suck on both sides, but I have heard no FACTS that a full template combatant will beat a full template defender 50% of the time, all things being equal.
Highly, highly doubtful. (this excludes "/offerride," "force run, "force cloak," house grinding," "house running, " "LOS exploits," and "Kashyyk /afk grinding," of course - These, of course, are reserved for the Jedi that don't stand to fight, so the numbers are surely HIGHLY screwed by this.)
BIG problem right there.
Not every full template is a defender. There are quite a few templates that have little to NO defender.
Yes, the Devs keep logs. Good ones at that. And THEY are the ones Tanks is reporting that feel that Jedi are close. That's my authority for citing. Where's yours?
Ummmm...
But that was the ENTIRE POINT of my post when I entered this horrendous thread:
***This wouldn't effect us against any other profession in the game, but would give most bounty hunters a chance again full template defenders...***
Again, there are lousy players and lousy templates, but don't tell me that full template defenders aren't the FOTM, full on, alpha, uber, 1.5x profession, because they sure as hell are.
They're not.
Message Edited by Leatherneck_of_Alderaan on 07-20-2005 12:10 PM
aekeem wrote:
SPY-DER wrote:
OMFG i had a TYPO end of the world
Lol its fun to read the BH forums and watch you all cry and complain.
what are you talking about? your whole post is what i had a problem with, the guy clearly stated that the numbers he was using were IRRELEVANT, look it up if you don't understand the word.
It's okay, man. Let it go. Hate leads to the dark side. Let him troll all he wants (but Christ, could it LEAST be constructive.) We'll just pretend he's not here (there is an ignore, too, maybe we should all use it
)
aekeem wrote:
Cada_Kai wrote:
aekeem wrote:
SPY-DER wrote:
+5 force defences per block ? your wanting more force defence then a master defender ? lol
you do speak english, right spy-der? dictionary.com is your friend for big words like irrelevant
TheMadCoder wrote:
(this numbers are irrelevent, but you get the general idea.)
Since you have to look for something to flame in every single post I thought I might point out that you are flaming the wrong person for not spelling correctly.
TheMadCoder made the spelling mistake not Spy-der.
If you are going to try and be the official forum spell checker then atleast get your target right before being an ass.
if you could comprehend what you read you'd notice the meaning of my post was not to point out the misspelling of irrelevant. i was pointing out that the numbers DIDN'T MATTER. hence the dictionary.com comment, suggesting maybe spy-der didn't understand the meaning of the word irrelevant. if someone misspells something i would recommend using the spell check included with the forums.
ok, Spy-der posted first.
Mad posted the reply.
Spyder never laid claim that the Numbers Didn't Matter.
You cannot find a decent argument so you pick apart every last detail. This has become you MO.
TheMadCoder wrote:
aekeem wrote:
SPY-DER wrote:
OMFG i had a TYPO end of the world
Lol its fun to read the BH forums and watch you all cry and complain.
what are you talking about? your whole post is what i had a problem with, the guy clearly stated that the numbers he was using were IRRELEVANT, look it up if you don't understand the word.
It's okay, man. Let it go. Hate leads to the dark side. Let him troll all he wants (but Christ, could it LEAST be constructive.) We'll just pretend he's not here (there is an ignore, too, maybe we should all use it
i find it funny that guy somehow thinks there's a typo involved and the other guy obviously just wants to start up an "aekeem fanc club"
