Bio Engineer Archive
Thread: Just when I thought...
Alright, I am throughly confussed about this. This has to deal with the DNA samples themselves. We get DNA samples, we put them together in order from physical - hardness/fortitude, prowess - dex/endeur.. etc etc et.. BUT when it comes time to do the experimentation, I get 2 percent for phyiscal,mental,prowess and 30+ percent for aggression and/or physcological. I had an idea about that, but I can't get it to work twice or I forgotten simple in the process or something.. Anyone know how to get phyiscal experimentation up above 1 percent?
I did it once, and made a gurreck with better stats than a tamed one in all the catagories, but I can't do it again. Please help me remember. I should have wrote myself notes...duh me. Thanks
Haplo, Scylla
In case you forgot:
"After a month of working hard and writing down numbers, I finally figured out tonight how to make an awesome AWESOME pet. I made a gurreck at 1100 ham (normal for tamed), with 600 damage, and that wasthe first timewith crap DNA. (I made a dalyrake at 850 ham, with usual damage - thats 200 health more than normal). What I'm worried about is the fact that BE's are going to get nerfed, or that there will be some change to this proceedure. I dont want it to change, I just figured it out and like it the way it is. Please if there is a developer reading this, please do not change it. Thanks.
Haplo, Scylla server"
What happened?
I tired to do the process again, the same way I did it before, and it didn't work (at least notwith very high samples with master BE). I've been experience grinding since I made that post, and well, dang it, I forgot. (I swear to God as my witness).
What I THOUGHT was that all the DNA samples had to be in similarity, and my reasoning was like (if you sample from a giant, and then from a miget your going to get an adverage person because it evens out). Like if you put 1000/900 from hardness/fortitudeinto physical, you also had to put similar stats into the prowess for the same hardness/fortitude, and so on down the line. So idealy if you hadfive DNA samples with all 1000 stats, you would have 100 percent experimentation. I DID this, and it worked.. but alas I went into an experience grind for CH and BE and dangit. Now I can't get it to work. I think i'm missing something or maybe my samples wern't close enough to change the experiementation. Another guy, Zurai I think was his name, also suggested this idea a little while back. Actually thinking about it, it might be that my samples wern't close enough together to change the experimentation. Its harder now at master lvl because they range from 400-1000+. I know that I know that this is possible because I did it before. There was more than one variable that much I remember. Well now you know my method. I remembered something after typing this out. Let me know if you guys come up with anything. Man I'm so stupid..
Haplo, Scylla
That's the only think that I can think of. I never have problems training any ranger (so long as they are not overt the other faction) and i have even taken opposing factions out to help them along. in my (and most) opinion ranger is ranger and it just seems that most of us value that above all else.
plase let me know if i am wrong about this.
Tibli wrote:
in my (and most) opinion ranger is ranger and it just seems that most of us value that above all else.
plase let me know if i am wrong about this.
Nope. Scout/Ranger is all I care about.
Heck, I honestly don't even care if they're overt. The only thing I care about is if they're a member of one of the various rebelguilds that my guild doesn't play well with, and even then it's more of a "do I know/get along withthis player or not" sort of thing.
It seems to me, the only time I've seen "discrimination" in the game was a) roleplaying related, or b)PvP related.
PithrenDarkstar wrote:
"What's/who's a guy gotta do to get the dang "edit" option?"
6 months and 100 posts
Weak. Really, really weak.
Oh well, only one more post, and what? 4 months? to go.
