Bio Engineer Archive
Thread: Publish 17 Cloning Changes: the consolidated short-course.
Did you happen to have any pre-CU deeds as well? How about DNA templates?
Kivrin wrote:
Uh oh.
Did you happen to have any pre-CU deeds as well? How about DNA templates?
only on my home server.
want to guess which one that is? I'll give you a hint... it hasn't seen more than two weeks of uptime since late march.
Spazzers wrote:
/fears for all that mutie DNA I stocked up on.
I don't have any on my Tempest BioE, but I talked to D'ark, and the short version of the stats (from memory):
hardiness 1000
fortitude 900some
I'd say that it'd still be useful... but watch out for the CL70 cap. I hit CL85 with CL62elite DNA on my TC-Bria test.
I'm wondering how many BE's have made and then tamed the pets on test.
Yesterday I travelled around on Dathomir gathering various samples of this and that seeing how they compared, and today I got the chance to make a couple of pets. The first came out level 71 but the second I made was a level 65 gurrcat. I retrained to MCH to test it and when called I found it to be way bigger than pre-CU gurrcats.
http://www.imagedump.com/index.cgi?pick=get&tp=255181&poll_id=0&warned=y
I don't know if this a bug or level based, I didn't get the chance to make another as the server shut down. It would be interesting to see if other skins come out the same way.
Message Edited by Cerestan on 05-26-2005 01:10 PM
Message Edited by Cerestan on 05-26-2005 01:11 PM
LOL
darkmeh wrote:
What is this madness! No .pdf's? How dare you assume that everyone out there has access to the luxury of excel! Am I not good enough to see this file? Is that what it is?
This is a blatant descrimation to all .pdf'ers and I think we, as the BE community,should stand up to this outrage and force lammergeier out of office unless he agrees togive us a.pdf file versionof his spreadsheet. No Bio-engineer should ever have to put up with such nonsense. Nonense, I say!
Who's withme!
Cerestan wrote:
I'm wondering how many BE's have made and then tamed the pets on test.
Yesterday I travelled around on Dathomir gathering various samples of this and that seeing how they compared, and today I got the chance to make a couple of pets. The first came out level 71 but the second I made was a level 65 gurrcat. I retrained to MCH to test it and when called I found it to be way bigger than pre-CU gurrcats.
I don't know if this a bug or level based, I didn't get the chance to make another as the server shut down. It would be interesting to see if other skins come out the same way.
Message Edited by Cerestan on 05-26-2005 01:10 PM
Message Edited by Cerestan on 05-26-2005 01:11 PM
that IS big. definitely something to keep an eye on. my tempest BioE is a mere 4114 CH, so I can't go past CL40... but my TC BioE is a mCH, so if I can get on TC (server status willing), I'll take a look.
Hm. I was looking at the sheet, and I looked under your aggro-hate values and you had .25, .32, .44, etc., and I was wondering if you're sure that it would be .25 %, and not .25=25%. I know that the actual thing says aggro %, but perhaps it's just a display issue they need to fix?
That's wishful thinking, at least.
darkmeh wrote:Hm. I was looking at the sheet, and I looked under your aggro-hate values and you had .25, .32, .44, etc., and I was wondering if you're sure that it would be .25 %, and not .25=25%. I know that the actual thing says aggro %, but perhaps it's just a display issue they need to fix?
That's wishful thinking, at least.
it does indeed display them as 0.xx%. I stripped the % part from the spreadsheet (which you can't see) because I'm not fluent enough with excel anymore to assign values as %, instead of raw numeric values.
you'll notice that the CL85 clone DOES have values above 0.5%.
I'm also just guessing right now on many of the new values and their effects, since testing isn't possible until the servers are online... and I'm waiting for some dev clarification (as noted in the preliminary discussion of the cloning changes).
What is this madness! No .pdf's? How dare you assume that everyone out there has access to the luxury of excel! Am I not good enough to see this file? Is that what it is?
This is a blatant descrimation to all .pdf'ers and I think we, as the BE community,should stand up to this outrage and force lammergeier out of office unless he agrees togive us a.pdf file versionof his spreadsheet. No Bio-engineer should ever have to put up with such nonsense. Nonense, I say!
Who's withme!
darkmeh wrote:What is this madness! No .pdf's? How dare you assume that everyone out there has access to the luxury of excel! Am I not good enough to see this file? Is that what it is?
This is a blatant descrimation to all .pdf'ers and I think we, as the BE community, should stand up to this outrage and force lammergeier out of office unless he agrees to give us a .pdf file version of his spreadsheet. No Bio-engineer should ever have to put up with such nonsense. Nonense, I say!
Who's with me!
I'll make a .pdf version available when I get home from work... to which I am running late.
nonence indeed. I'll be wearing the Veil of Shame until I remedy my oversight.
highlight the cells you want to change, right click, format cells, and change the type to percentile or numeric or whatever you want
it will automatically convert .25 to 25% on the display 
droid327 wrote:highlight the cells you want to change, right click, format cells, and change the type to percentile or numeric or whatever you want
it will automatically convert .25 to 25% on the display
thanks. I haven't used excel in about five years, and it shows.
note, however, that the value IS 0.25%... which is painfully low.