Armorsmith Archive
Thread: 2 different smiths able to hit 44 stun on Intrepid(Edited on Oct 14 with how we did it)
Gimme a break, the damage reduction over time in any PVP fighting when wearing 44% Stun or 41% Stun will be minimal...
You're BRAGGING about a 3% difference which when you consider that stun batons can only hit health or random pools, 44% Stun armor won't help you any better than 41%.
Evena 44% Stun helmet vs. a 41% Stun Helmet will yield getting hit with a Jawa, for example, for 500 points of Stun damage will be 220 vs. 205 damage. 15 points of stun damage difference not taking into consideration ANY Synthsteak or PSG's one may be wearing. BIG DEAL!
What you're bragging about is pointless, meaningless and shows you're a noob crafter.
Nichrf36 wrote:
Ox- wrote:
You will report back here if CSR's confiscate them right? (There were complaints by AS on this forum when CSR's confiscated some of their 41%+ pieces they crafted on nerf day).
Ok I welcome you to go on my server and report us.
Your math above is correct, but you arent looking at the whole crafting process. Divulge my secret? Of course not, Ima businessman and I dont wanna see every smith on our server making these.
The only thing I will hint at is for FS crafters- these are even more possible.
-Precision- wrote:
Gimme a break, the damage reduction over time in any PVP fighting when wearing 44% Stun or 41% Stun will be minimal...
You're BRAGGING about a 3% difference which when you consider that stun batons can only hit health or random pools, 44% Stun armor won't help you any better than 41%.
Evena 44% Stun helmet vs. a 41% Stun Helmet will yield getting hit with a Jawa, for example, for 500 points of Stun damage will be 220 vs. 205 damage. 15 points of stun damage difference not taking into consideration ANY Synthsteak or PSG's one may be wearing. BIG DEAL!
What you're bragging about is pointless, meaningless and shows you're a noob crafter.
Nichrf36 wrote:
Ox- wrote:
You will report back here if CSR's confiscate them right? (There were complaints by AS on this forum when CSR's confiscated some of their 41%+ pieces they crafted on nerf day).
Ok I welcome you to go on my server and report us.
Your math above is correct, but you arent looking at the whole crafting process. Divulge my secret? Of course not, Ima businessman and I dont wanna see every smith on our server making these.
The only thing I will hint at is for FS crafters- these are even more possible.
He did an awesome thing that no one had done before. He's most definitely not a noob, unless spending countless hours trying to make the community happy is a "noob".
Thanks for the salt. I do enjoy laughing at worthless posts like this.
-Precision- wrote:
Gimme a break, the damage reduction over time in any PVP fighting when wearing 44% Stun or 41% Stun will be minimal...
You're BRAGGING about a 3% difference which when you consider that stun batons can only hit health or random pools, 44% Stun armor won't help you any better than 41%.
Evena 44% Stun helmet vs. a 41% Stun Helmet will yield getting hit with a Jawa, for example, for 500 points of Stun damage will be 220 vs. 205 damage. 15 points of stun damage difference not taking into consideration ANY Synthsteak or PSG's one may be wearing. BIG DEAL!
What you're bragging about is pointless, meaningless and shows you're a noob crafter.
maybe someone is a bit envious that he cant do it himself or maybe he is a noob crafter...
I know one of the joys of crafting is trying to do better all the time, if it makes a lick of difference in the end has nothing to do with it.
Just gotta do it because it can be done!!
Go back to your cave troll or go back to stalking sheep from under your bridge
Faded_One wrote:
I have to say that I believe some of the best smiths have posted on this thread. Granted the difference is minimal, but that is not the point. A "noob" would look at 41% vs. 44% and say "Bah its no big deal", but the MAS that has dedicated countless hours crafting and trying to make the best possible armor will look at this and say "damn impressive". It's not about the 3% difference. It's about bending the expeimentation cap and doing what we have thought could not be done. It is this type of pioneering that keeps raising the bar. Currently I can not say I have done it and me personally as a MAS, I want the bragging rights to have made it. If it has been done and can be repeated I will try to do it on my server and post my findings when I do. 5 stars to all those that are looking at this as an amazing find!
Keep the good work up all!!!!
Yea the 3% difference may not be much but like you said it isnt the point.
Its like a car doing the quarter mile in 10 seconds versus the other one in 10.1 seconds. Hey may only be 0.1 seconds but he won didnt he?
. I've got a couple questions for you Rocky that I hope you will answer. I have a hard time understanding a couple statements you made. And usually what I do is just assemble a layer quick, and if I don't get an amazing on the first attempt, I end the process right there and start on another. So I could understand what he means when he says it's easy to miss them. I used to pay little attention to the percentages, but I've learned now that we probably should watch closer.
I would just like confirmation on.... does the assembly give you a higher experimental percentage, so that you could see you have a 30% on step 3 when you normally have about 24%? Or can you just spend more experiment points on the lines, meaning you wouldn't know it until you maxed out the line... very strange.
Also strange that most everyone that has said they got a critical success talks about using newly spawned resources... hmmm...
justapilgrim wrote:
OK!!!
On the assembly screen my comp chest was 27% instead of 25% (middle row) and I was able to hit 72% base on the chest. I was barely scraping 70% with the chest at a 88% experimentation. I was able to experiment it up to 93% and get 2 more points out of the base.
royalewitcheez wrote:
Skinny, were any of the resource you used current spawns?
it was on a chest
filu, eleoipi, erek, elat, ogieah, finofek none of those are current (plus the segs) average prob 6 months old, I just did arun by hand to see if it was possible, and to me, it was, unfortunately it was on a chest that I could have made 5 of and not on a layer