Architect Archive
Thread: 98% Experimentaion Med. Harv. only BER 9?
Ok, here we go again. Even after she says she is a Master Architect since October, used great metal(she has not said what the chemical is yet, but if her final combine is 98% for the harvster she is using lube oil orsomeother very high chem)and experimented as high as she could for the fluidic pump, people are still saying it is the fluidic pump. Even if she doesn't know theexact percent she experimented with, she said she experimented to its fullest. Which would be around 98% with her materials. It soundsto me she has been using the same materials to do all of this as she keeps sayingthat if she has enough materials left she will do anotherrun. Unless she is totally mistaken about this and got a failure in one of her experimenation rolls, these pumps are good. The only thing that can be wrong here is her schematic became bugged. Or maybe the pumps are bugging out when she places them in the slots to make the actual havester.
Niklesnitz wrote:
...The only thing that can be wrong here is her schematic became bugged. Or maybe the pumps are bugging out when she places them in the slots to make the actual havester.
You can not rule out the possibility that she has made an error. We all make errors on occasion. Its not an attack on her character or capabilities. We're just trying to get to the bottom of it. I'm not ruling out a bug but you should not rule out the possibility of human error either.
Couple data points: She does not remember the exact percent. She apparenlty did not label her schematics. Given this I think it would be quite easy for the schematic to be not what she thinks it is.
It's just so easy for people to think it is human error. This game is riddled with bugs and even though I have never experienced this myself, or even half the bugs that people say are in this game, I believe that something is amiss with her items.
I don't completely rule out she may not have the right pumps for it to work, but I just don't think it is in this case.
- tell us *EXACTLY* what resources that you used on the mining component (the stats for HR/SR/UT) and what quality you got them up to
- tell us *EXACTLY* what resources you used in the final assembly (HR/SR/UT) and what your final quality was
- tell us final BER
Without *facts*, all we can do is speculate and ask questions. If there is a bug out there, the only way we'll be able to narrow it down is to show a pattern.