Architect Archive
Thread: Our next question
I totally agree with Fivo and Bandola: Thunderheart DID NOT answered to our question.
So I would insist on that question again and again until we get a more detailed answer.
I was wondering if the community would consider asking an agressive question such as this to Thunderheart during our next chance to submit a question? "What do you think the advantage to being a carbineer should be in PvP/in PvE combat?" or "Does the dev team realize how and why carbineers are such inadequate fighters in high end PvP/PvE?" I beleive questions like these would force the dev team to tell us what our probelms are, then we can see how much they really understand.The dev teamwill be forced to directly acknowledge our problems or their ignorance of our problems. If the dev team proves to be ignorant of our issues we would then have the opportunity to enlighten them. Just something I thought the community might be interested in.
TAfirehawk wrote:
Gee...think we should wait until our last question is answered......MAYBE!!!!
/bonk JerikArca this is Nova's job.....
Although with our Corr "gone" for 7 days serving his suspension, maybe the rest of us do have to take the initiative here.....
jfang wrote:
TAfirehawk wrote:
Gee...think we should wait until our last question is answered......MAYBE!!!!
/bonk JerikArca this is Nova's job.....
Although with our Corr "gone" for 7 days serving his suspension, maybe the rest of us do have to take the initiative here.....
I vote Rorenikibi as temporary benevolent dictator. I don't trust TAfirehawk. He's already organized a successful coup against our former benevolent dictator, Novamarine...
/emote looks around worriedly
9,714 more to go...
Resistance is Futile.....
JerikArca wrote:
"Dear Thunderheart can you explain what the advantages to being a carbineer should be in PvP/in PvE combat?" or "Dear Thunderhear can you explain how and why carbineers are such inadequate fighters in high end PvP/PvE?"
I can tell you are pretty angry at SOE about the state of carbineer and I do not blame you. However, this question would be a waste because TH's answer would be:
"We want Carbineer to be a fun and excitingprofession to play. After the upcoming combat rebalance the profession will be getting a lot more interesting."
Thunderheart dodges questions like these like a dodgeball master. The point of the 19 questions is really not to stick things into Thunderheart's face (remember, TH takes the brunt of critisism but he is in fact just a liason, in the strict sense, he is not a Dev) as if he is not aware Carbineer is a forgotten profession. They are fully aware of the problems, believe me. The problem is not making the Dev's aware of problems, it is that the Dev's have many issues to address and only so many hours in the day. The Devs ARE aware of the problems and fixes ARE coming. The point of the 19 questions is to find out a little tid bit about the profession. That is why we try to ask questions about the game rather than confront the Devs. And FWIW, a few of the other correspondants have still not figured out this subtilty and continue to ask confrontational questions and, not surprisingly, get back confontational answers.
Bennyboy4308 wrote:
The question should be "What did TAfirehawk say to a dev which created such dev hate to carbineers?"
OH THAT IS COLD......
Cold Damage Carbine....how did you get one of those..... 