Architect Archive
Thread: 3P0 said harvestor change mistake, why are people experimenting....
I am a master architect and I would only like the change if they grandfather existing harvestors. Otherwise it would not be fair. Eventually they would get flushed out. Look at pre nerf Pro Bots, and CH pets. If you are going to make a change of this magnitude you must grandfather existing harvestors.
Youa re partially right Archimast. It was my understand that experimentation was going live, but that the extraction rates would not be experimental due to it being over-powered. I will go ahead and replace mine with some neweer experimented ones although it's possible some of mine are already pretty good since I always tried to use nice components even though it didn;t matter.
praolith
Crobsahm,
The last two posts are correct. Experimentation will stay. You have misinterpreted what 3PO said. "These figures will not go live" referred only to the grandfather figures. The experimentation was a deliberate change that the majority of architects have asked for in polls and will remain (for now)
Tinkerer, Master Architect, Wanderhome
Is there a message from the devs that says this? I would just like to read it so I can be happy that experimenting won't go away.
Where do they say this? I would like to read their post. I would be a very happy camper if the experimenting is going to stay.
grr I hate the forum software!
It was a mistake because this "big" harvester change is not mention in patch notes, and the big question now is ...
They will revert or not?
Please DEVs hurry with the answer cos ppl need to know what to do, if we make new harvesters, if we sell cheap and fast the old ones with low storage and rate....argh what a mess u have made...at least if this changes will stay dont change the pre-patch harvesters cos i dont want to be next 2-4 weeks making heavys to replace my old ones and hurry with the decision cos resource shifts is coming soon.