Weaponsmith Archive
Thread: Official Apology to Logix
Nurani_ENT wrote:
weatheror not the nerf effects him or not, he needs to voice our concerns on this.
As long as he does his job, regardless of his personal opinion, he's welcome to be our rep for the duration of his term. if he drops the ball on this one like the fwg5 crate issue, then that's another story.
Already did. Posts were deleted along with those from armorsmith and other correspondents.
Correspondent forum is probably pretty interesting now.
I greatly appreciate the sentiment; I really didn't intend to come off as having an unfounded, knee-jerk reaction to the changes. I wouldn't immediately go against a proposal unless my defiance really had merit.
That said, unfortunately, I'm going to be around a bit less .. hopefully no longer than a week or two. I'm moving into a new place, rather short-notice, this coming Monday. If all works out well, I should have my internet connection back up and ready to go real quick, then I'll see about checking in with you in regards to resources.
In the meantime, I encourage all of you to feel free to send me PMs on the board with your findings or anecdotes or opinions and I'll review them at every opportunity I get. The crafter Correspondents are working diligently to get to the bottom of this issue so rest assured, you're in good hands. I recommend taking a trip over to the Armorsmith boards if you're seeking more updates.
Thanks for your support.
Message Edited by Logix on 03-08-2004 10:17 PM
Btw Logix, since this is an apology thread. I do want you to know ifI haven't been clear on it, I do think you are the best correspondent we have had so far. When I got into your rear and started that thread it was due to a specific grievance and was not a critique of your job overall. I also think it was great that you were willing to discuss with me, regardless of my orginal tone, in public to help make some headway on the situation. I also felt by the end of the thread we had made headway on the issue, I felt that you were listening to what my thoughts were for what they were, and not dismissing them because I was upset about the situation and beign not so nice (TH's posting about a week abck of how he doesn't reply to threads if he doesn't like the tone is the type of thing I am talking about). Sometimes other people do have good ideas or realistic critiicisms, regardless of how upset they are by something or the wording they choose to use. I am glad that you took the time to discuss with me, argue with me, and maybe come to understand my viewpoint on some things. I felt that even through other people's comment on both sides of the discussion that I gained something from it.
On a side note, Pip Tazo (Pahdbacca on the boards) is staying with my gf and I. So I know what the coors. have to deal with on a aily basis, I had teh opprotunity to read over his shoulder on quite a few occasions. You guys do get hosed, and I hope I was clear on that in the original thread. I think a lot of times you get stuck knowing bad news is coming and you aren't supposed to say things about it...and that's what correspondents are there for in the devs eyes, to soak up the excess damage control.
Anyhow, again I think you have done the best job so far, and I appreaciate your abilty to handle problems and dsicuss things directly with someone.
Nurani_ENT wrote:
weatheror not the nerf effects him or not, he needs to voice our concerns on this.
As long as he does his job, regardless of his personal opinion, he's welcome to be our rep for the duration of his term. if he drops the ball on this one like the fwg5 crate issue, then that's another story.
Yes of course. Your correspondant does nothing at all except sit around and say "wow devs you guys are the greatest" and I can clearly see how the devs nerfing crates of pre patch weapons is entirelyhis fault as well.
/rolls_eyes