Weaponsmith Archive
Thread: Power Handler Dilemma
Page 1 of 1
Tepic_Sand
Thu Oct 07, 2004 11:39 pm
#1
Ive been a wep smith on Kettemoorfor almost 3 months now, and i have been collecting materials for advanced blaster power handlers. The last APBHs that i made were done so fairly good materials and came out at 20 min, 40 max and -0.39 speed. Just recently we have had a spawn of nice polymer and some very nice ostrine ore. Now at least 4 of the materials im using are better than the ones i used before, and here they are:
Polymer: OQ-993
Diatum Copper: OQ-985 CD-783
Ostrine Carbonate Ore: OQ-765
Phrik Aluminium: OQ-847 CD-696
Irolunn Reactive Gas: OQ-894
Now bearing in mind what i made last time, and now im in a research center & wearing a tool kit....the best i can seem to make is min 19, max 38 and speed -0.38 
Anything im doing wrong? I experiment 2 blocks at a time normally, is there a better way?
Message Edited by Tepic_Sand on 10-08-2004 08:10 AM
Eaca
Fri Oct 08, 2004 4:06 am
#2
Don't mind me I'm just trolling the boards, but I do appreciate people like you who try to make the best out of thier products, 5 stars 
Now can somebody else help this guy out? 
Now can somebody else help this guy out?
PluG
Fri Oct 08, 2004 6:27 am
#3
The percentages aren't 66%CD 33%OQ. Only 2 of the 5 resources have conductivity, so it weighs heavier than normal.
According to my Fooman's SWGTool, the percentages are:
Phrik Aluminum: 87%CD 13%OQ
Polymer: 67%CD 33%OQ
Diatium Copper: 87%CD 13%OQ
Irolunn Gas: 67%CD 33%OQ
Ostrine Ore: 67%CD 33%OQ
Phrik1: CD-696 (87% = 606) OQ-847 (13% = 110). 606+110 = 716
Phrik2: CD-746 (87% = 649) OQ-656 (13% = 85). 649+85 = 734
So, Phrik2 is actualy better.
According to my Fooman's SWGTool, the percentages are:
Phrik Aluminum: 87%CD 13%OQ
Polymer: 67%CD 33%OQ
Diatium Copper: 87%CD 13%OQ
Irolunn Gas: 67%CD 33%OQ
Ostrine Ore: 67%CD 33%OQ
Phrik1: CD-696 (87% = 606) OQ-847 (13% = 110). 606+110 = 716
Phrik2: CD-746 (87% = 649) OQ-656 (13% = 85). 649+85 = 734
So, Phrik2 is actualy better.
CorenLanra
Fri Oct 08, 2004 6:50 am
#4
yup even if the "average" of the phrik is higher, if the conductivity part (66%) is much bigger than the other phrik which "average" is actually lower, the ABPH will come out better with the one with higher conductivity usually. This happened here on Chilastra also comparing Ibiism and Voino
Tepic_Sand
Fri Oct 08, 2004 12:03 pm
#5
Ok something very weird going on here, I just tried out 2 different aluminiums and got some funny results
Phrik Aluminium 1: CD-696 (66% = 459) OQ-847 (33% = 279). 459+279 = 738
ABPH came out at min19, max 38 and speed -0.38
Phrik Aluminium 2: CD-746 (66% = 492) OQ-656 (33% = 216). 492+216 = 708
ABPH came out at min20, max 40 and speed -0.39
Clearly the first is the best stuff, but the component comes out better when using the second type. The experimental ratios are CD66% OQ33%, but i dont think its working like this. I tried some alu with 800 CD and 88 OQ and even this came out better than the first type. (19 min, 39 max and speed -0.38).
DarthDumbledore
Sat Oct 09, 2004 11:45 pm
#7
CorenLanra wrote:
yup even if the "average" of the phrik is higher, if the conductivity part (66%) is much bigger than the other phrik which "average" is actually lower, the ABPH will come out better with the one with higher conductivity usually. This happened here on Chilastra also comparing Ibiism and Voino
So, how does our newest phrik (obaoferiete) stack up to the old voino or have you had the chance to test it yet?
776CD 954OQ
Page 1 of 1