Weaponsmith Archive

Thread: Date Tag on Weapons

Malinko_Oknilam
Sat Jul 10, 2004 4:02 pm
#1

Sorry I dont really belong here, but .. I think weapons should have Date Tags on them, older = Pricier ya know? Just wanted to suggest hehe. =P



Malinko ~ Oknilam
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
S.....\.. Who's your daddy?.../....P
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
He told me you killed him....\....W..../... .....No, I, am your father.
Brilyn
Sat Jul 10, 2004 4:20 pm
#2

< older = Pricier ya know? >


I'm *so* against that rationale.


God, I hate seeing "Pre-Nerf blah for sale..... 1 billion creds!"



As much as I'd like to see 'date created' on stuff, it'd just be 'so I'd know'.... no real purpose to it at all.



Brilyn
Master Weaponsmith
Master Shipwright
Main vendor on Naboo, Vagabond's Rest: -1850, 2330
Secondary vendor on Talus, Kyu'mai: 250, -4680
Starsider
kettmalice
Sun Jul 11, 2004 1:05 pm
#3

I like the idea of dates on weapons. They wont be worth much to use but would be nice to have antiques. Like I have some krayted launcher pistols made a very long time ago and they are barely better then normal lp's now.



K E T
M A L I C E
12 Point Master Weaponsmith212 -5756, South of Coronet


Bought this account on ebay how do I play
EEMAN
Sun Jul 11, 2004 1:22 pm
#4

not going to happen. Database data is a premium real estate and every bit and byte has to be squashed and shrunk as much as possible to combat lag. Considering every time you walk into a house or open a vendor, there are literally hundreds of lookups for just you, multiply that by the other 3,000 people on the server at the same time. There are other ways to date weapons, but it is based on changes to game mechanics like when they fixed projectile barrels and feed mechanisms, nerfed the feed mech/power handler combo weapons etc. I can look at, for example, an FWG5 and almost be able to tell when it was made on my server because the stats changed multiple times as they fixed components.

Another thing to keep in mind is they have never given us back the item limits on houses we once had despite the 75 item per lot change was supposed to be a 'temporary fix' to deal with database problems.



Omosack
Master Weaponsmith
Master Shipwright
Better Homes and Guns - in the Chilastra Galaxy

- It's time the devs end the bitter fighting by giving the community a Non Jedi server. We have a few servers with TINY populations that could be changed to this ruleset. I support this idea because it punishes noone. - You can support it too. Click Here!
Nacoa
Mon Jul 12, 2004 12:58 am
#5



Malinko_Oknilam wrote:
Sorry I dont really belong here, but .. I think weapons should have Date Tags on them, older = Pricier ya know? Just wanted to suggest hehe. =P





I'd argue the reverse is true in SWG. Ignoring pre-nerf, weapons are going to get better over time, as better resources spawn. Since there really isn't much intrest in antiques in SWG, the newest weapons will probably be considered the most valuable.





I'm baaaaaack
And it looks like I'll be going again.

d0qtrX
Mon Jul 12, 2004 11:47 am
#6






EEMAN wrote:
not going to happen. Database data is a premium real estate and every bit and byte has to be squashed and shrunk as much as possible to combat lag. Considering every time you walk into a house or open a vendor, there are literally hundreds of lookups for just you, multiply that by the other 3,000 people on the server at the same time. There are other ways to date weapons, but it is based on changes to game mechanics like when they fixed projectile barrels and feed mechanisms, nerfed the feed mech/power handler combo weapons etc. I can look at, for example, an FWG5 and almost be able to tell when it was made on my server because the stats changed multiple times as they fixed components.

Another thing to keep in mind is they have never given us back the item limits on houses we once had despite the 75 item per lot change was supposed to be a 'temporary fix' to deal with database problems.






So what do you think takes up more DB space: 100 100k stacks of resources or 10 1M stacks?


Page 1 of 1
Previous Next