Weaponsmith Archive
Thread: Time for me to go.
Page 6 of 6
maigy
Wed Apr 27, 2005 5:32 pm
#66
Trean wrote:
Ybagi wrote:
Trean wrote:
Sorry to see you go Felton.
You were/are undoubtedly one of the best Weaponsmith coorespondants, certainly a lot better than your predecessor.
no class
Everyone is entitled to his or her own opinion. However, if you want to do something classy, remove the yellow ribbon from your signature. That ribbon is meant to support the healthy and quick return of troops that are abroad, not for some idiotic protest.
And I always thought the yellow ribbon was to support the capitalistic Ideal that everyone can make a buck even if all you do is try to think of more ways to have people buy yellow ribbons from you.
OH well I don't post in this board nearly enough, and I prolly won't be posting here much in the future, seeing as how I will be done with this game in less than8 weeks. But I always thought you did a great job See... I wish you the best of luck in all your future endeavors.
wparson
Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:03 am
#67
We won't be far behind you Felton, Good Job, good Luck to us all.
Etyrnal
Fri Apr 29, 2005 1:26 pm
#68
I do not usually come to this forum but did today to see about CU affects on weaponsmiths and find out info on the new swords since I am a swordsman and fencer, it disturbs me much to see another Cor step down (the Fencer one did so last week). This is no reflection on Felton but those stepping down letters look suspiciously similar. I smell something on the wind and it smells like death, the death of an online community.
SlaserX
Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:11 pm
#69
You sir, will be missed. You are the best correspondant out there, and everyone knows it. May you shine a brighter shade of blue. Thank you for all of your services.
caddelite
Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:36 pm
#70
Never knew you, but I will not distract from those who do. I would apply for your job, however, if you look at my current threads on the WS forum, I have uncovered, I suspect, to me a number of serious development and mathematical errors on the part of SOE coders/developers. The suspect issues are so... drastic, that applying for the new correspondant position, I know, would require ME to the code the MWS code because of the blatent miscalcuations in examined weapon DPS, provide a "SCALED Combat Level Requirement to Special Action Cost" and fill in the gaps with a weapon in nearly every class between CLR 15-30.
Not to mention we were also promised that pre-CU weapons WOULD BE BETTER than current CU weapons, however, an estimate 40 million credit Power Hammer I had which as 1008 max damage with a PU, now does 289.76 DPS and my current, non-acklay CU PH does 289.58 damage. Tell me how 0.18 DPS makes a 40 million credit PH "better" than a hammer I can now sell for over 1000% less credits?
DToxWeaponsInc
Sat May 14, 2005 9:59 am
#71
/sad
I've been offline for a bit myself. Took some time off to play WoW. Although I'm coming back to Naritus. I left when Logix decided that I wasn't good enough for the Sandbox becuase I was not the original D'tox (who played for4 months). Heh, then I took over and made weaps ever since. Totally understood,
Oh, wow that Bible is hawt! I still have the emails from way back when you wanted to get that going. You left quite the impression on many weaponsmiths. A shame to see you go...
/salute
Page 6 of 6