Teras Kasi Archive

Thread: VK or no VK

Skragg
Sat Dec 06, 2003 12:37 am
#1

Im about to start unarmed brawler, now i know that you need NTK to be certified, but i read somewhere to get some sliced for speed anyway so that you hit more often, even tho your damage wont be great. Or should i just go unarmed?




Thanks in advance

Steinerguy
Sat Dec 06, 2003 12:49 am
#2

get a speed sliced vk with that is faster than 2.2 speed.


You will attack nearly 3 times faster using vk's and even though you do less damage the amount of speed you will gain compensates for that. one thing to note is that using a vk will increase the ham cost of specials so be careful.


Steiner - Teras Kasi Master

64Bit
Sat Dec 06, 2003 11:38 am
#3

/agree


you can get sliced vks to 1.4 spd. Makes a huge difference




===========
Bria - retired
Chilastra - TKM - MD
exMCH,MScout,MMarksman,MBrawler


JEAUX_ZUF
Sat Dec 06, 2003 11:43 am
#4

yup




Jeauxzuf
TKO - Sensei GAT Quarterspondant
No, no, no. You walk up to them and say: "Nice shoes...wanna f*ck?" - Graflex3 - I Support Annoying, Pointless Bandwagons. You can too!

DecXel
Sun Dec 07, 2003 12:44 am
#5

you will do about 5-20 less damage if i remember rightly, but the speed bonus means that your damage over 10 seconds will be about 200 more(i've been up for about 18 hours my maths might be a bit off.......)

Imperio59
Sun Dec 07, 2003 1:53 am
#6

But using a 2.2 speed VK when you are not cert'ed is worse than going totally unarmed?




_________________________________________________________

Eclipse: Imperia, Jedi, Sony Sensitive Grinder!
TC: Imperia
Test Center: "We test, because we care..."

Tappen
Sun Dec 07, 2003 1:58 am
#7

A 2.2 speed VK is still about 50% better overall than completely unarmed, in my estimation.
Page 1 of 1
Previous Next