Teras Kasi Archive

Thread: Good Vibroknuckler?

Xantaros
Sat Nov 22, 2003 4:49 pm
#1

I was just wondering what a good vibroknucklers speed and damage should be. The one I have is 1.5 speed with 133 max damage.



Xantaros
DewBackTF
Sat Nov 22, 2003 5:09 pm
#2

Well the Vibroknuck im currently using and paid 500k for ...



forgot min - 217 damage


2.0 speed


44.8 % wound


asdffff i forget ham






~o ~o ~o ~o ~o ~o ~o ~o ~o
~o ~o ~o ~o ~o ~o ~o ~o ~o
~o ~o
Atib Bellar : Chilastra ~o ~o
~o ~o ~o ~o ~o ~o ~o ~o ~o
~o ~o ~o ~o ~o ~o ~o ~o ~o


seant9
Sat Nov 22, 2003 5:55 pm
#3

Believe it or not, now my favorite Vibro Knuckler is one I looted off of a Tusken Captain. The damage is low, but the HAM cost are also really low, like 11/17/15 with a 3.0 speed or something along those lines. I examined it and said "Ughh" and was going to delete it. Then it occurred to me, I have power 4 so the speed is not an issue. Even though the damage is low, it would give all my attacks an AR1 rating and increase the damage a little. And with the insanely low HAM costs, I could use specials all day. I was right, I tried it at the Tusken fort and the difference is amazing.




(gnn[[[[[[[[[[]nnnWX9ggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg)


Sea-to Hidal - Krayt Oasis, Tattooine - <BGH>



DracoRain
Sat Nov 22, 2003 5:56 pm
#4

Wow, Dew, think you got ripped off. I got ones that do 174 max (forgot min as well). Go at 2.1 speed and have 35% wound chance. HAM cost is 35/52/35. I payed 3,500 for these. As in three thousand five hundred. So unless your HAM costs are 0/0/0 and even then, I'd find a new weaponsmith.

DewBackTF
Sat Nov 22, 2003 6:13 pm
#5

ripped off?

its still better then what youll ever see, even if it is by a little damage, it matters to me

eh, and its just fake money anyway




~o ~o ~o ~o ~o ~o ~o ~o ~o
~o ~o ~o ~o ~o ~o ~o ~o ~o
~o ~o
Atib Bellar : Chilastra ~o ~o
~o ~o ~o ~o ~o ~o ~o ~o ~o
~o ~o ~o ~o ~o ~o ~o ~o ~o


Page 1 of 1
Previous Next