Teras Kasi Archive
Thread: COmposite or Ubese??
Page 1 of 1
Master_Cam
Thu Jul 01, 2004 10:29 pm
#1
Im just wondering becuase i have seen alot of good Ubese and Composite and I hear that composite is very good but Ubese can be even better for a Teras Kasi. IM just not sure what to get. High KInetic Ubese or... High Kinetic Composite.
Oreet
Fri Jul 02, 2004 5:11 am
#2
personally, i enjoy a good rancor hunt in my boxers. always a good time. great whenever a commando drives by, sees me in my boxers and is so jealous that i can take them without the need for armor.
but, i would find the lowest encumberance composite you could possibly find. that way your secodnaries will still be high enough to heal you faster than an enemy can hurt you.
Nuckman
Fri Jul 02, 2004 6:46 am
#3
ubese hel is less emcum as long as you have comp chest and legs the rest can be ubese
and on the arm pieces and helmet you usually dont get hit there by mobs as much
for every piece of everything else i go through 2 or 3 chest plates before i even have to repair the arms and helmet
does that make since its still kinda early
RasterVex
Fri Jul 02, 2004 7:12 am
#4
pve ubese 
but I usually fight armorless, unless it's against some NS or some other tough MOB.
And when I do pvp of course it's composite.
DukeRith
Fri Jul 02, 2004 9:55 am
#6
i only have comp. normalyi dotn wear armor, so the only time i need it is for things like the DWB or the Corvete
JuCat
Fri Jul 02, 2004 11:20 am
#7
Spuzzed wrote:
For PvE youll want ubese. Unless youre fighting NPC's most of the mobs youll be fighting will deal kinetic damage. There really isnt any use for ubese other than the kinetic resistances. The encumberances on ubese armour is also a lot lower than composite.
For PvP composite is mandatory. People in PvP are now using "stun" based weapons and composite is slowly catching up to todays PvP styles. If youre going to be dueling Jedi then you might as well not wear anything as they will just tear up your armour.
I heard they were making tantel, and padded armor LS dam resistant...?? I bet RIS and Mando will be too
Spuzzed
Fri Jul 02, 2004 12:03 pm
#8
For PvE youll want ubese. Unless youre fighting NPC's most of the mobs youll be fighting will deal kinetic damage. There really isnt any use for ubese other than the kinetic resistances. The encumberances on ubese armour is also a lot lower than composite.
For PvP composite is mandatory. People in PvP are now using "stun" based weapons and composite is slowly catching up to todays PvP styles. If youre going to be dueling Jedi then you might as well not wear anything as they will just tear up your armour.
For PvP composite is mandatory. People in PvP are now using "stun" based weapons and composite is slowly catching up to todays PvP styles. If youre going to be dueling Jedi then you might as well not wear anything as they will just tear up your armour.
GrayFox9420
Fri Jul 02, 2004 8:42 pm
#9
For most high-level PvE (NS elders, krayt dragons, etc), a good suit of 7x% Ubese is all you'll need. Low-level stuff I do n00d. 
If I'm up against NPCs with guns, I have a great lightweight (3xx/3xx/3xx enc) suit of 38% energy/6% stun composite that really takes the edge off the big hits.
PvP, on the other hand, I have no idea. My only real experience with it is when an overt Imp catches me with a TEF and pwns me, LOL.
If I'm up against NPCs with guns, I have a great lightweight (3xx/3xx/3xx enc) suit of 38% energy/6% stun composite that really takes the edge off the big hits.
PvP, on the other hand, I have no idea. My only real experience with it is when an overt Imp catches me with a TEF and pwns me, LOL.
teeth0r
Sat Jul 03, 2004 7:06 pm
#10
PVE: kinetic compo.
PVP: stun compo.
For PVE I suppose Ubese is cheaper, but it has about 1/3 themax condition of Composite so to my mind there isn't a massive difference. I just prefer not having to repair/replace my armour so often.
Page 1 of 1