Teras Kasi Archive
Thread: AT-ST vulnerability
No, I haven't found one.
But I read and replied to an old post with an idea, want to hear from you all what you think.
No, we shouldn't get any bonuses in damage to an AT-ST, only commandos should, its their function.
BUT wouldn't it make sense thatANY melee engaged with an AT-ST in close quarters (i.e. under its chasis) be very hard to hit by the AT-ST? Unless it moved away from us.
My idea here is not to give us an option to solo an AT-ST, but to make us a viable part of defeating one, part of a good strategy. Melees could be the 'gnat' that keeps an AT-ST distracted while the commando prepares his shots.
just a thought.
Faitt
TKM, MB, MS, Wayfarer
MysticTrunks wrote:
I found thier weekness.... Ewoks. 3 and a half foot tall talking rat bears can take these things with nothing but rocks and some big twigs.
Ewoks do knockdowns too, and their ham doesn't even budge...what's that fuzzy pipsqueek got that I don't have? I know...I bet they have some kind of jungle juice they make that makes a Tatooine Sunburn look like a Tatooine Farmers Tan. And they aren't sharing...those b*st*rds.
Nerf Ewoks!
Liriel Baenre
Yeah, little did Leia know when Wicket showed up that she was in the presence of a FOREST GOD.
I want Rangers to have access to those Ewok tree-traps that can kill AT-STs. Criminy.
To Dorjhe:
It's been a while since i have brushed up but :
1 At-St captured
1 At-St destroyed by swinging logs
1 At-St destroyed by rolling logs
1 At-St destroyed by the other At-St
If someone could check this for me i would be thankful. ( Again it has been a while since i have brushed up )
I think that makes sense, but as long as you are talking "realistic," what's from keeping all 30 of you and your closest buddies from cramming under the beast? *cough* clipping *cough*
Also,as someone pointed out in an earlier post... Those are awfully big feet that thing has on it.
-Dio