Teras Kasi Archive
Thread: KD1 vs. KD2
Page 1 of 1
Aladine
Fri Mar 12, 2004 10:14 am
#1
I have heard from different peopleoff the boards that KD1 is better then KD2 and vice versa, what do you guys think? I use KD2, but I just do so because I figured it was better then KD1. Is this not the case, and is comparing KD2 to KD1 like comparing Pistol Mele Defence 2 to PMD1?
Thanks!
lund0529
Fri Mar 12, 2004 12:34 pm
#2
I just went back to KD1 from 3443 mostly because it seems to hit more often, and KD+Dizzy doesn't seem to keep anything down in PvE anyway. Not sure about the HAM costs, but I would think KD1 would be lighter.
Ariekb
Fri Mar 12, 2004 3:03 pm
#3
my intial attack is KD2 because it not only knocks the MoB down but it adds dizzy...as for continious attack KD1 is better cause it costs 1/2 that of KD 2 in ham. for the most part it is all personal prefference as to wich you like better.
Lorcan21
Sat Mar 13, 2004 4:42 am
#4
I use KD1 for 4 legged things and KD2 for two legged things 
KD1 with warcry = takes down big game animals, b ut seems to me very high ham cost
KD2= on tuskens and pesky rebels is great hardly any ham loss and there dizzy too hehe
)
Rebster
Sat Mar 13, 2004 4:58 am
#5
There is no point what so ever to use kd2 in pve due to dizzy doesnt help in pve.i only use kd1 on creatures and kd2 on npc's and a few times in pvp theres no point using kd2 in pve due the ham as well why use it . just thought i would passon my found knowledge.
biffanizering
Sun Mar 14, 2004 2:17 am
#6
i almost never use KD2 in pvp because if you use it and that dizzy doesnt decide to stick the kd is bassically worhtless. your better of dizzying your target first then kding them just to be safe
Lorcan21
Sun Mar 14, 2004 4:11 am
#7
if my kd2 dosent stick on a dizzy i keep trying till it lands then lunge
Page 1 of 1