Teras Kasi Archive

Thread: Updates from the developers on our top 5

DJsCuBa
Sat Feb 07, 2004 8:44 pm
#79

where did my other post go? nevermind i'll just repeat myself then...if we have 2 hands and a vk is only one handed why carnt we equip 2 ov them??? even though the ham costs would be higher atleast we should have that option?? maybe
Jirran
Fri Feb 13, 2004 6:09 pm
#80

While some damage type other than kinetic would be appreciated, I would be just as pleased if no creature had 100% resistance to a damage type. Especially kinetic. If you drop a star destroyer on such a creature, would it not go "ouch"? 95% should probably be the cap for resistance in most cases.
EnderStarfall
Fri Feb 13, 2004 6:55 pm
#81



How about new state damage or DoT damage. Maybe we could get somone like a BE to make add ons for VKs that give mild Acid or Poison or Disease damage type. It would make things more intresting for sure.



(gggggggggggggggxnnntnnnnnnntnnnxggggggggggggggg)
"In this world gone mad, we won't spank the Monkey. The Monkey will spank us!
(gggggggggggggggxnnntnnnnnnntnnnxggggggggggggggg)
Click here to support Glzmo's great Visions to save SWG!

Elder Fencer Elder Swordsman Elder Brawler Elder Marksman
Elder Pikeman Elder Teras Kasi Elder Ranger Elder Scout Elder Doctor
Elder Medic Elder Politician Elder Jedi
Shinjo_Kanzaki
Sat Feb 28, 2004 8:15 pm
#82


Mister_Heavy wrote:
- We'd like to have more damage types.
  1. We disagree. This is an elite unarmed profession. Teras Kasi has a number of unique advantages, as we als being an all-around excellent damage dealer. Limitation to kinetic damage is one of the disadvantages that balances the Teras Kasi profession with the other brawling professions
  2. Note - I've been told by ThunderHeart that he's willing to bring a full proposal to the Devs on this point for us. I'll start a new post where we can compile our thoughts on the issue. I feel that if we put together a solid argument that incorporates a reasonable additional damage type (like restraint), that we can win them over.



i don't believe the profession needs different damage types. hell i don't agree that TKs (unarmed) have to use VKs, a Fencer's (one-handed) weapon of choice is a baton, and that Swordsmen (heavy sword?) uses a hammer.



____________________

Shinjo Kanzaki - Sentinel


It's not lag, it's bullet-time.
rdpmackie
Wed Apr 07, 2004 6:33 am
#83

has this really not been edited since december of last year?!? 4 whole months without any issues/responses updates!?!?!?!?



(ggggggggggggggggg9W[[[R[O[M[A[C[[[X9ggggggggggggggggg)
- j e d i f a b u l o u s -
- A L L A E m b h -
- for teh win -
Oreet
Tue May 04, 2004 10:03 am
#84






Jirran wrote:
While some damage type other than kinetic would be appreciated, I would be just as pleased if no creature had 100% resistance to a damage type. Especially kinetic. If you drop a star destroyer on such a creature, would it not go "ouch"? 95% should probably be the cap for resistance in most cases.




LMAO!!!


So do i need to start looking up at the sky and start having to dodge falling star destroyers? LMAO.






Jirran wrote:
If you drop a star destroyer on such a creature, would it not go "ouch"?



This is one of the funniest things i've ever read on the forums.




Page 7 of 7