Teras Kasi Archive
Thread: UH3 vs. KD vs. UH2
Nope, im Human, im not even Master TK, and I do more damage than she does on *armored* creatures with resists (like 10-15% kinetic) than she does on nunas with no AR, low CL, no resists at TKM.
So those values must be off by a lot 
What would be an interesting comparison would be unarmed UH3 versus VK UH2.
Human (4/3/3/3), VKs at 49-144: 2.1, HAM cost close to the original poster.
I believe the max I've hit for on a UH2 is around 13 or 1400 lowest was around 700. But as a general rule it expect it to be around 1k floatydamage. No KD2 or UH3to compare here but I thought I'd post a human hitting value in hopes it would help.
RicoUnderwood wrote:
Human (4/3/3/3), VKs at 49-144: 2.1, HAM cost close to the original poster.
I believe the max I've hit for on a UH2 is around 13 or 1400 lowest was around 700. But as a general rule it expect it to be around 1k floatydamage. No KD2 or UH3to compare here but I thought I'd post a human hitting value in hopes it would help.
the dmg values should be the same for everyone. the only thing that changes from one person to the next is Ham exspense. you wont do more dmg or do less dmg then the next guy, but you will spend less ham.
these percentages are taken from a wookie TKM...myself. I exspect people to spend a little more ham then i do , but the percentages should be around the same.
as for the knuckler used it was a 145+ a 35% dmg slice, so it is a 194 brand spanking new VK when i did the tests.
Perhaps there is some kind of invisible bump if you get passed 200s etc, but as far as i know, everyone with a 194 dmg vk will be doing this dmg i posted.
this does not take into account resists, because these mobs had
1) no AR
2) no kinetic resits
*note* values will be less vs mobs with armor and with resists
*note* obviously these are not pvp values, but you can do a pretty easy run up on that
pvp:
-75%
-60-90% kinetic AR1 (composite)