Teras Kasi Archive
Thread: Dual wield VK
Saborcoco wrote:
Has anyone proposed for the teras kasi to be able to wield 2 VK. The pistoleers have and i dont know if this will be an issue on the combat revamp or not but I really think it is a good idea. Why should we be limited to one vk if we have to hands?
Better question is how would the extra VK benefit us without making us over powered? If it is for looks alone then there is no point... Hardly see them. I like the idea of dual weilding pistols... The class needs something. I rather take a second damage type over dual weild 24/7/365 (366 on leap years).
frANtiCbLAcKoUt wrote:
if this were to happen, then our HAM costs might be doubled. C R A Z Y ! ! !
think about how much HAM we would use up.
mmmm... i like ham...
Lol. But dual-wield, if limited to fencer and pistoleer, then it must exclude the geo pistol and stun baton... it would make them unbeatable in pvp. And dual-wield with TK would also make us way overpowered.
Message Edited by djswift2k on 09-17-2004 08:31 PM
A VK should become a pair of VKs, and the only change needed is a name change and a graphics change.
You may ask, "What's the point?" What if a sword looked like a pistol and a fencer was swinging at people with it in combat? It would be stupid even if it had no real impact on stats. Same deal with a VK, why does a TKA wear a single VK and then go into battle swinging both fists?
Stun weapons are no more powerful in PVP than any other weapon.
quitch wrote:
frANtiCbLAcKoUt wrote:
if this were to happen, then our HAM costs might be doubled. C R A Z Y ! ! !
think about how much HAM we would use up.
mmmm... i like ham...
Lol. But dual-wield, if limited to fencer and pistoleer, then it must exclude the geo pistol and stun baton... it would make them unbeatable in pvp. And dual-wield with TK would also make us way overpowered.
Really? Have you ever seen a Master Fencer or Master Pistoleerfight anyone else? Most people have low or no stun resists, so it goes right through their armor.
Sovi-FFO wrote:
Stun weapons are no more powerful in PVP than any other weapon.
Oufeic wrote:
Why does almost everyone use a JAwa Ion Rifle..?? Stun is VERY useful in pvp
Again, 40% stun armor.
Let's not forget PSGs (up to 48%stun unsliced on my server)as well.
Now, instead of a jawa I have 2 choices. a Disruptor Rifle (Acid Damage) or a T21 (energy damage)
Ill post rough examples of my rifles
Jawa: 100-400 damage with a powerup AP1 (Stun)Gets blocked 40% by armor, then another 48% by a PSG
Disruptor: 200-600 With a powerup AP2 (Acid)Blocked by 80% Composite (Average stats) By 80% AP bonus goes into effect +25% PSG does not effect because of Vuln to Acid
T21:200-700 With a powerup AP3 (Energy)Highest damage weapon. Blocked by 80% composite AP bonus goes into effect +50% damage. Also Blocked by PSG but since of AP bonus does not work.
Which is going to do more damage? Does it Really matter which rifle you are using?