Tailor Archive
Thread: response from BE corre to question I posted on testcenter forum re: Pub18~~ Please Read!!
lammergeier wrote:
don't worry... BioE enhanced syn cloth and RFP's don't work with p18, either. the colors are the least of your worries.
Message Edited by ZahrIna on 06-14-2005 05:49 AM
ItemCreator wrote:
That better get fixed before it hits live or SOE will be facing Rage of the Tailors, and it won't just be arms that are ripped off!
Their Hawtpants too ?
I keep hoping its a bad dream and tomorrow afternoon (I'm in the Uk) the factory crates colour bug will be fixed and the BE problem will be non-existant *crosses lekku*
ItemCreator wrote:
And publish 18 is going live tomorrow according to the announcements forum *sigh*
I keep hoping its a bad dream and tomorrow afternoon (I'm in the Uk) the factory crates colour bug will be fixed and the BE problem will be non-existant *crosses lekku*
So far I haven't been able to test to see if the bug was stealth fixed or not. For now I would suggest that anyone who has cloth ready to try to crank out enough BE clothing to last a few days just in case the fix doesn't make it in by tomorrow and I will keep asking about it. I think that there might be one more set of fixes before the publish goes live but I am not sure about it.
NJ62 wrote:
These swaps from TC to TC-Serveroftheweek really make it difficult to test anything.
Falech wrote:
*shakes head negatively*
Dis not be good... Not good at all...
I have not been part of the community for that long yet, but I am beginning to wonder lately how and why we put up with this any longer.
For a long time I have just taken things as they came, accepted as part of the package thatwhich went awry. But these days it seems more and morethat with every publish or update that is supposed to FIX bugs, too many systems that originally worked well BECOME bugged. And if efforts would be made to undo these ASAP... However it seems new content is more important that flawless gameplay... *sighs*
And I'm gettinga little annoyed too about them hiding behind the excuse of complex code all the time... Tell me something I don't know...
Trust me, I know. It's either sloppy programming and bad coordination plain and simple, OR it's having dellusional managementbreathing down your neck to meet unrealistic deadlines which facilitates rushed release. Software projects, of any size,don't have to be like this.
All things considered, it's probably the latter... *sighs* God forbid it's both... And I'm not bashing here, mind you. It's just that the road to hell is paved with good intentions, if you know what I mean. I am beginning to think more and more like the "We pay the bills!"-people...
I guess we just like the game too much...
Let me know if something I wrote is offendingand I'll edit it out...
Offending? Nope..well said and better than I could have put it.
ZahrIna wrote:
NJ62 wrote:
These swaps from TC to TC-Serveroftheweek really make it difficult to test anything.
You're not kidding... I just don't understand where the rational thought process has gone.
they needed load testing.
I just wish that they would go find other hardware and not take TC off. it really screwed things up and now it's too late
Pappi wrote:
ZahrIna wrote:
NJ62 wrote:
These swaps from TC to TC-Serveroftheweek really make it difficult to test anything.
You're not kidding... I just don't understand where the rational thought process has gone.
they needed load testing.
I just wish that they would go find other hardware and not take TC off. it really screwed things up and now it's too late
HA! poor thing.. you sound like a redhat. !!*J/K*!!![]()
They've run TCPrime and TC(insert galaxy name here) together before, haven't they? As in when it was my servers' run (eclipse)? I might be completely wrong. What I do know is that you CAN and should load test and take the time to Prime test ANYTHING before it goes live. It's a "choice" which brings me back to the prior statement.
Disclaimer: Ifthe above sounds like I am bashing a person that I truly respect;I'm not. I just can not seem to be very charming with my verbage, atm. PLEASE do not take the statement personally, Pappi!!!!! (well the redhat is kinda mean
)
*shakes head negatively*
Dis not be good... Not good at all...
I have not been part of the community for that long yet, but I am beginning to wonder lately how and why we put up with this any longer.
For a long time I have just taken things as they came, accepted as part of the package thatwhich went awry. But these days it seems more and morethat with every publish or update that is supposed to FIX bugs, too many systems that originally worked well BECOME bugged. And if efforts would be made to undo these ASAP... However it seems new content is more important that flawless gameplay... *sighs*
And I'm gettinga little annoyed too about them hiding behind the excuse of complex code all the time... Tell me something I don't know...
Trust me, I know. It's either sloppy programming and bad coordination plain and simple, OR it's having dellusional managementbreathing down your neck to meet unrealistic deadlines which facilitates rushed release. Software projects, of any size,don't have to be like this.
All things considered, it's probably the latter... *sighs* God forbid it's both... And I'm not bashing here, mind you. It's just that the road to hell is paved with good intentions, if you know what I mean. I am beginning to think more and more like the "We pay the bills!"-people... ![]()
I guess we just like the game too much...
Let me know if something I wrote is offending
and I'll edit it out...