Swordsman Archive
Thread: My warcry/intimidate proposal
Page 1 of 1
NashDarksabre
Thu Mar 25, 2004 6:31 pm
#1
We all know that warcry was nerfed in the last patch, and many have been trying to come up with ways to improve it somewhat.
My proposal is this:
First of all, give warcry a snare effect, like many have already talked about. The main issue with this, which many have brought up, is that ranged players could use this against us, as a way to kite us far more easily.
My solution to this, is to remove warcry from novice brawler. That way, most ranged players would not have the ability, and those that did (from getting master brawler), would pretty much deserve to have it.
Another concern of mine (probably my primary concern, in fact), has been how easily ranged players can access intimidate. It gives them the ability to render our counterattack useless, and cut our damage in half. And all it takes is novice brawler, which most ranged players have.
Both warcry and intimidate should be removed from novice brawler, and warcry 2 and intimidate 2 should simply have the 2's removed from their names (the abilities themselves should remain the same).
Lastly, warcry and intimidate should be made so that they only work when a melee weapon is equiped (This ultimately would not do ALL that much, unless perhaps they made it so the effects of either would wear off if you equiped a ranged weapon...but I understand this might be a bit too much to ask for.).
All these things would make master brawler much more worthwhile to pick up.
My proposal is this:
First of all, give warcry a snare effect, like many have already talked about. The main issue with this, which many have brought up, is that ranged players could use this against us, as a way to kite us far more easily.
My solution to this, is to remove warcry from novice brawler. That way, most ranged players would not have the ability, and those that did (from getting master brawler), would pretty much deserve to have it.
Another concern of mine (probably my primary concern, in fact), has been how easily ranged players can access intimidate. It gives them the ability to render our counterattack useless, and cut our damage in half. And all it takes is novice brawler, which most ranged players have.
Both warcry and intimidate should be removed from novice brawler, and warcry 2 and intimidate 2 should simply have the 2's removed from their names (the abilities themselves should remain the same).
Lastly, warcry and intimidate should be made so that they only work when a melee weapon is equiped (This ultimately would not do ALL that much, unless perhaps they made it so the effects of either would wear off if you equiped a ranged weapon...but I understand this might be a bit too much to ask for.).
All these things would make master brawler much more worthwhile to pick up.
raider7734
Thu Mar 25, 2004 9:15 pm
#2
don't know what to say about warcry, but re:Intimidate...I think elite brawlers should get much more defense vs. intimidate. I mean cripes!we are the ones going right up and beating on nightsisters,hordes ofcrazy geonosians, and piles of tuskens...why should a marksmanwaving a republic blaster have any more than a1 in 10 chance of intimidating us?
Page 1 of 1