Swordsman Archive
Thread: why do cleavers suck?
Page 1 of 1
2pacalypse_Now
Sat Jan 03, 2004 4:59 am
#1
didnt they used to be good? now they do crappy damage and have crappy speed....
Kryos
Sat Jan 03, 2004 5:04 am
#2
I dont think they suxx. As a Bothan do the higher Action ham on cleavers and lower mind/health fit me fine. Dmg not high, but not low either. It deal a good consitant dmg.... not a bad weapon at all.
twoheadstalkin
Sat Jan 03, 2004 5:14 am
#3
once u hit master that speed will not seem as bad i use a claever to leave a mark in the person on the other side wound chance is much better with them then on hammer or ywo handed curveds an there damage is has a better range ie.. 150-300 in stead of a two handed curveds rough 77-240
Soulburner69
Sat Jan 03, 2004 2:00 pm
#4
the two handed axe is on par with the cleaver, but it has low action and mind, and higher health, with about a 4.0 speed... and better range mods than a cleaver, which is good for the characters with high health, and low action and mind scores. but i still think the weapon depends on the persons tastes and the way they want to go with their character, ham costs, range mods, damage, or otherwise. and thus is why i use the axe and the hammer.
Page 1 of 1