Swordsman Archive

Thread: why do cleavers suck?

2pacalypse_Now
Sat Jan 03, 2004 4:59 am
#1

didnt they used to be good? now they do crappy damage and have crappy speed....

Kryos
Sat Jan 03, 2004 5:04 am
#2

I dont think they suxx. As a Bothan do the higher Action ham on cleavers and lower mind/health fit me fine. Dmg not high, but not low either. It deal a good consitant dmg.... not a bad weapon at all.



Emar Ab'Lya
Imperial Captain
Kettemoor
twoheadstalkin
Sat Jan 03, 2004 5:14 am
#3

once u hit master that speed will not seem as bad i use a claever to leave a mark in the person on the other side wound chance is much better with them then on hammer or ywo handed curveds an there damage is has a better range ie.. 150-300 in stead of a two handed curveds rough 77-240



Idos Starwind - Master Swordsman from way back in the day....

I have chosen to support the NGE because I love SWG.
Soulburner69
Sat Jan 03, 2004 2:00 pm
#4

the two handed axe is on par with the cleaver, but it has low action and mind, and higher health, with about a 4.0 speed... and better range mods than a cleaver, which is good for the characters with high health, and low action and mind scores. but i still think the weapon depends on the persons tastes and the way they want to go with their character, ham costs, range mods, damage, or otherwise. and thus is why i use the axe and the hammer.



Anoreoa Lo'Bachi
Master Dancer, Master Entertainer, and Master Musician
Inrepid
*************
Thrass Frassdems
Master Swordsman: Warrior, Master Brawler
Wanderhome
Page 1 of 1
Previous Next