Squad Leader Archive

Thread: Why isn't SL a MELEE Profession?

HzGuderian
Wed Sep 28, 2005 2:43 pm
#14

Melee SL is a nice poetic thought. Believe me, as a history major and a Civil War Reenactor, I sell into this idea all the time. Though I'll take a katana or even a Prussian cavalry saber over an American Civil War saber any day. They just look too flimsy. But.. ANYWAY..


Wrong era for that sort of thing, really. As they'd mentioned previously, since the gun REALLY took off as the master of battlefield, and cavalry charges were no longer viable (ask those that tried to charge the German panzers in WW2), we don't have too many melee-weilding leaders. Consider your lieutenants and captains, and on up to your colonels and generals, since WW1. Assault rifles for the lower ranks and pistols, at most, for the upper ranks. (General Patton's ivory-handled pistols come to mind. The Japanese samurai officers being the modern day exception, but that was still 70 years ago and long gone.) The most melee-ish thing is the bayonet on the assault rifle, used only occasionally in a bayonet form, or sometimes a knife-fight. But often used as a field knife.






Heinz Guderian
Colonel, Imperial Army
Commander
Knights of Mors Astralis (AMOK)
Ahazi
captiansarcasmo
Thu Sep 29, 2005 12:53 am
#15

i never understood swords and giant hammers in the star wars universe, none the less a stromtrooper swinging one leading his troops.



jailyn

Blackferne
Thu Sep 29, 2005 7:02 am
#16

Why isn't SL a MELEE Profession?

I'll tell you why: you don't bring a knife to a gun fight.



Jounville Blackferne
"No one plays SWG to be Uncle Owen" -Dallas Dickenson


HzGuderian
Thu Sep 29, 2005 7:13 am
#17


Someone forgot to tell the majority of the American Civil War officers that.

And the WW1 officers..




Heinz Guderian
Colonel, Imperial Army
Commander
Knights of Mors Astralis (AMOK)
Ahazi
AlienEntity
Thu Sep 29, 2005 8:04 am
#18

This is the wrong era for swords. If you've got to run to get to a guy with a gun, who's going to win? Will the guy with a gun not shoot at you so you can get up close and let you get some licks in before he starts shooting you? Um...no. For some, people keep talking about WWI & II, Vietnam and the Civil War. Sure, some people then used swords, but um...they didn't space ships or beam weapons. Heck, even in SW universe even black powdered weapons are considered archaic at best. I'll keep my gun and no I have someone chargeshot you to knock you down so I can kill you faster while you're attempting to get up close to me with your swords/pike/and your various 1-H weapon.



Colonel Talley Darkstar, Master Squad Leader, Alliance Ace Pilot-Crimson Phoenix Squadron, Rifleman
Squad Leader Cache Colonel Talley Darkstar Classified Squad Leader Files
Kharast
Thu Sep 29, 2005 8:14 am
#19

when considering this debate keep in mind that classical historic references in which officers wield a melee weaponhad more to do with tradition than tactical edge.


tactically speaking, ranged profs have a competitive advantage over melee profs. for examples of this, look at the potentially devastating roots and snares and the havoc they create on the melee combatant.


if you have a romanticized view of your SL toon, then by all means pick up a sword. no one will begrudge you. infact, you'll be pretty rare.i myself will do this as i unlock my jedi skills. but the cost in skill points and change in playstyle to do that makes me tactically weaker.



Melee and Ranged:
Officers go both ways!
KJFett3
Thu Sep 29, 2005 8:38 am
#20






HzGuderian wrote:


Someone forgot to tell the majority of the American Civil War officers that.

And the WW1 officers..




I'm pretty sure that the sword wasn't standard combat issue for our officers in WW1. The Civil War was the lastmajor war thatlarge numbers of American officers carried swords into combat. The differences between the 2 wars explains much in the reason that the sword was dropped in favor or a rifle or pistol for the officers. (I do exempt from that statement trench warfare in WW1 as melee was common..but not related to officers specifically..as almost everyone had a big knife or club for that.) Heck, even in the Civil War, the officers were much more likely to pull their pistol in combat than draw a sword.




!Drevin of DROW!
!!
Ellyria
Thu Sep 29, 2005 8:40 am
#21

If you look at it from a star wars stand point, you didnt see too much fighting that didnt involve guns/blasters. melee was pretty uncommon.




____________\\ Ellandria //_____________
______________________________________
_______________||[ LOLSTARSHARDS ]||_______________
____________// Warlock Mana Battery \\____________
My [poiplz] r more ubahest then yours



lostswede
Thu Sep 29, 2005 10:34 am
#22






Ellyria wrote:
If you look at it from a star wars stand point, you didnt see too much fighting that didnt involve guns/blasters. melee was pretty uncommon.






Totaly true if we dont take primintive cultures as Tuskens(tuskens got rifles but most seem to use gaffi sticks), Niktos(the niktos got a sect of killers with cortoisis polearms)and Gamoreans. The Gamoreans even prefere clubs and axes to blasters and is popular mercs for the hutts.Alot of jabbas henchmens in the movies that we see fighting is using melee weapon and they get there butt kicked.


Butthe Emperors elite gard the red emperors guard is melee fighters trainned in echani martial arts(some type of tkm) and pikes/polarms, with blaster pistols for special situation and i can't call them primintive. They can wipe out alot of ranged fighters before those fighters even know what hits them at least in the star wars comics.


Greivious bodyguards is also melee fighters and they seem to be hardest opponents the jedis have if we dont count other jedis.


When it comes to refering to real life historical events i say they arent relative in star wars because we dont have all those cultures and spieces as we got in star wars and it should be just out of our human culture view. By the way i did serve as a squad leader or more as a company leader in the swedish military and i was using an assault rifle and was trainned in sniper rifles, pistols, submachine guns, machineguns, anti armour rockets and grenade launchers so i say melee there was limited to basic hand to hand and some knife/bayonett use but it was just in extreme self defense when notihng else worked. But we got gangs in Somalia that took out mercenery units with machettes and clubs so in some parts of the world do melee still happen and can if ppl are prepered to sacrifice them self beat ranged fighters if they out number them.


Melee for squadleaders or not in swg i say i think ranged is good, but it may not hurt to open up for those who wants ot play melee squadleaders and not penalty to them if they chose to do that. After all this is a rollplaying game and if they want to play a primintive savage squadleader so should they be able to do it, but most sl abilities only buff ranged weapons so i would rather then see a melee squadleader type that buff melee parallell qith the squadleader i love as a ranged fighter. After all we are living in a big galaxy there we should have many option because it shall be big and that means room for diffrent cultures and civilization.


I am locking forward to see the changes you guys shall get and i hope i can hope you guys dont get handicapped with the new changes and they instead gives good bonuses so ppl will scream for your services.


Fein out







Toowachyyk
/RIP: Social Aspect Of SWG\
<Date of Death: Nov. 15, 2005>
\-Gone But Not Forgotten- /

MikDiBoken
Thu Sep 29, 2005 3:32 pm
#23






ShadowLightning wrote:


When was the last time you ever saw a battle scene when the leader/general/commander/king takes his men out to war with a Gun or a Bow?? Leaders grab their sword and go into battle!





Robin Hood



Colonel Mik'di Boken, Imperial Army
Level 90 Officer (Elder Master Squad Leader)

"I have nothing to offer but /bleed, grinds, action costs and whines." - Sir Winston Churchill
KJFett3
Thu Sep 29, 2005 5:23 pm
#24






ShadowLightning wrote:


When was the last time you ever saw a battle scene when the leader/general/commander/king takes his men out to war with a Gun or a Bow?? Leaders grab their sword and go into battle!






"We were soldiers".



!Drevin of DROW!
!!
TireeG2
Thu Sep 29, 2005 9:07 pm
#25






ShadowLightning wrote:


When was the last time you ever saw a battle scene when the leader/general/commander/king takes his men out to war with a Gun or a Bow?? Leaders grab their sword and go into battle!




That's a valid view, but I think it's mostly applicable to outdated kinds of warfare, as has been mentioned by some others here. I know Star Wars isn't the same setting as our time, given the abilites of jedi and such, but I think it probably fits closer than most other eras. When I think about squad leaders I tend to think about more present day situations,Marines in Iraq or Vietnam for example. One leader commanding a small team of soldiers, each with specific roles and duties in that group. You could even say it's the model for how I'd like my squad to behave.


I do have a slightly biased opinion though, I'm much more partial to ranged professions. It just feels more Star Warsy to me. The occasional melee and Jedi is fine, and I've learned to live with how many we have these days. Ranged is the dominatefighting styleseen inStar Wars so I don't really have a problem with it being a requirement for SL.



cccccccccccccccccccccccccc ccccccccccccccBrighamBasilone-Eclipsecc ccccccccccccBriggBasilone-Radiantccc cccccccccccBelieve me sweetie, I got enough to feed the needycccccccc
DrakkoFett
Mon Oct 03, 2005 4:58 pm
#26

There is a great line in the movie about Vietnam"WE WERE SOLDIERS". Mel Gibson is Lt. Col., Sam Elliot is his Sgt. Maj. They are about to go into battle for the first time with the new M16. Sam Elliot plays a war hardened officer who only carries a .45 colt. Mel Gibson asks him if he wants to carry an M16. He replies: "If there comes a time when I'll need a rifle there will be plenty of them laying on the ground."


Sasher Redo


Page 2 of 5