Smuggler Archive
Thread: Veela's E3 Info Compendium
MISTagent01 wrote:
LD will most likely NOT see a nerf. The dev I spoke to said that they're happy with the damage output on it...although he did say I had a reallypowerful DL44, and about flipped when I told him I had 722 DPS on it.
Is it wrong that I want to have this tatooed to the back of my hand and run to the Jedi forums and backhand the people that whined about this and say "HAHAHAHAHHA!" There's your nerf!!!!
You know I'm really not that vindictive but that whole 'Nerf LD' movement was really pissing me off.
MISTagent01 wrote:
Mentski wrote:
MISTagent01 wrote:
Slicing is coming first, and it's not what's in the IC Forum, it's a bit different than that. Look for the slicing stuff to be implemented after publish 17 comes out (most likely, no promises.)
Why does this fill me with dread...
I think its something to do with seeing the CU in context stuff, and then getting the CU only to find out it was far more simplistic eventually (remember them talking about concentrated and dispersed damage, and settings on guns... and then all we got was fixed damage outputs, kinetic and energy damage with a bit of elemental.
hopefully they havent done the same thing again and "streamlined" the process. The reason we wanted something new with slicing because it was so oversimplicised.
If its actually better than what they posted in concept - yay.
If its a dumbed down version of their original intention... Arms are going flying. /Wookieeroar
Actually, what was explained to me was better than the mini-game type crap that's on the IC board. It's similar, but I think better in the long run, as the mini-game is going to get really old, really fast for us. So, fear not!
I'm glad everyone enjoyed my info! I had a great time over at the SOE and LucasArts booth.
so you can't give us any hints on what this "better than the mini-game" thing will be?
cause i kinda liked the sound of the mini-game
of course i'd love to have something truely better than it!
heh, I forgot about this thread. ![]()
Nice gun, for sure. Though I'm kinda relieved in a way to see that the 722 DPS is a pupped DPS. What's the base/mod DPS when the pistol doesn't have that speed pup on it?
And I seriously hope you never fire it without as many action buffs as you can take, because you'll be out of action in no time with a 118 action cost. You might be better served by using reinforced stocks on it to lower the action cost instead of a speed pup. At 1.98 base speed, it's already pretty fast for a pistol. ![]()
MISTagent01 wrote:
Nicolas_Frost wrote:
MISTagent01 wrote:
P__Day wrote:
MISTagent01 wrote:
Ok, once more....new clicky.My 722 DPS DL44 XT
NICE GUN! that Amem guy must be one he11 of a ws
Oh yeah, totally! His guns roxxor my soxxorz!
I thought that pirate you mentioned did that.
Hey now! I call cross-thread shenanigans on you!![]()
Well, I never make mistakes, but I guess this would qualify as a stnank and might be worthy of doing different.