Smuggler Archive
Thread: weapons slicing, is random really the correct term? read before flame
Page 2 of 2
Nicolas_Frost
Sat Aug 21, 2004 11:20 pm
#14
shagalot wrote:
second de-10 34% damage
jesus people i didnt say "OMG IF YOUR WEAPON IS BETTER THAN I GUARENTEE A HIGHER SLICE!! OMG I FIGURED IT OUT!"
re-read what i said, its still random, but even though you flame boys are gunna flame me i still think that certain weapons are more prone to certain ranges of slicing
Hmmm, where did I say that you infered better weapons get higher slices?
You must have assumed that from where I said nickles(worth less money) got tails while quarters(worth more money) got heads. I never said heads or tails on any given coin is better or worse, would you have prefered I said top and bottom?
Oh, and by the way, just in case you were confused, I did not flame, nor am I flaming. People tend to get confused when I get precise and factual. Which is not intended. I only intend to be extremely clear so that my point gets across and is well understood.
By the way, you can go on thinking that certain weapons will be more prone to certain slicing ranges, but you will be wrong, and we will all know it.
Harsh? Maybe, but only the most dense people around won't understand what I said.
shagalot
Sun Aug 22, 2004 2:36 am
#15
"Hmmm, where did I say that you infered better weapons get higher slices?
You must have assumed that from where I said nickles(worth less money) got tails while quarters(worth more money) got heads. I never said heads or tails on any given coin is better or worse, would you have prefered I said top and bottom?
Oh, and by the way, just in case you were confused, I did not flame, nor am I flaming. People tend to get confused when I get precise and factual. Which is not intended. I only intend to be extremely clear so that my point gets across and is well understood.
By the way, you can go on thinking that certain weapons will be more prone to certain slicing ranges, but you will be wrong, and we will all know it.
Harsh? Maybe, but only the most dense people around won't understand what I said."
thats awsome but i wasnt talking to you, gj pulling yourself into the spotlight though
Kthx bye
You must have assumed that from where I said nickles(worth less money) got tails while quarters(worth more money) got heads. I never said heads or tails on any given coin is better or worse, would you have prefered I said top and bottom?
Oh, and by the way, just in case you were confused, I did not flame, nor am I flaming. People tend to get confused when I get precise and factual. Which is not intended. I only intend to be extremely clear so that my point gets across and is well understood.
By the way, you can go on thinking that certain weapons will be more prone to certain slicing ranges, but you will be wrong, and we will all know it.
Harsh? Maybe, but only the most dense people around won't understand what I said."
thats awsome but i wasnt talking to you, gj pulling yourself into the spotlight though
Kthx bye
Nicolas_Frost
Sun Aug 22, 2004 2:55 am
#16
shagalot wrote:
"Hmmm, where did I say that you infered better weapons get higher slices?
You must have assumed that from where I said nickles(worth less money) got tails while quarters(worth more money) got heads. I never said heads or tails on any given coin is better or worse, would you have prefered I said top and bottom?
Oh, and by the way, just in case you were confused, I did not flame, nor am I flaming. People tend to get confused when I get precise and factual. Which is not intended. I only intend to be extremely clear so that my point gets across and is well understood.
By the way, you can go on thinking that certain weapons will be more prone to certain slicing ranges, but you will be wrong, and we will all know it.
Harsh? Maybe, but only the most dense people around won't understand what I said."
thats awsome but i wasnt talking to you, gj pulling yourself into the spotlight though
Kthx bye
1. I do not want, nor do I need to be in the spotlight.
2. When you do not let people know who you are talking to, we are only left with the unnamed quote. There is a button to click that will automaticly quote the text of whoever you are replying to. And by "whoever you are replying to", I mean the name by the reply button sitting at the top of each post in the thread.
Now, I will get purposefully mean.
Good job on being a self-indulgent ass. I will have no more to do with this thread.
/wash hands
Zandergeef
Sun Aug 22, 2004 3:09 pm
#17
You just got very lucky. I sliced my geo pistols for low damage slices.. my friend got a decent speed slice on his last scythe I sliced for him but I have gotten 35% damage slices on pieces of junk that I sliced for a noob or some looted wepon with a DOT that I decided to slice for fun.
Slicing is random.. sometimes you get lucky but over time it will even out.
Slicing is random.. sometimes you get lucky but over time it will even out.
fishbrains
Sun Aug 22, 2004 3:11 pm
#18
/sigh the only thing that effects slicing is hawtpants. I wish more people would just understand this 
Page 2 of 2