Shipwright Archive
Thread: PLEASE ADD 'SET NAME' FOR RE'd COMPONENTS
DingoBoi wrote:
not really an issue.. find a standard that it does accept and use that
i use EPC RE Level IV as my standard. works fine (you can't use numbers)
Yes - it really IS an issue.You can't use the above name if the last charge in the RE tool is used up because there's no option to give it a name.
Instead of defending a broken system, you should try and look it from other points of view.
Ewach wrote:
DingoBoi wrote:
not really an issue.. find a standard that it does accept and use that
i use EPC RE Level IV as my standard. works fine (you can't use numbers)
Yes - it really IS an issue.You can't use the above name if the last charge in the RE tool is used up because there's no option to give it a name.
Instead of defending a broken system, you should try and look it from other points of view.
I still stand by my request above. If we had a 'Set Name' option on components that were RE'd by us similiar to backpacks and waypoints, life for shipwrights would be a little better.
This isn't something that involves a tremendous amount of programmatic effort. I understand that it isn't a game breaking issue yet the benefit to our professsion far out weighs the time needed to fix it.
i have and it's not an issue. you don't fix a bug by adding a new feature.
Ewach wrote:
DingoBoi wrote:
not really an issue.. find a standard that it does accept and use that
i use EPC RE Level IV as my standard. works fine (you can't use numbers)
Yes - it really IS an issue.You can't use the above name if the last charge in the RE tool is used up because there's no option to give it a name.
Instead of defending a broken system, you should try and look it from other points of view.
DingoBoi wrote:i have and it's not an issue. you don't fix a bug by adding a new feature.
Ewach wrote:
DingoBoi wrote:not really an issue.. find a standard that it does accept and use thati use EPC RE Level IV as my standard. works fine (you can't use numbers)Yes - it really IS an issue. You can't use the above name if the last charge in the RE tool is used up because there's no option to give it a name.
Instead of defending a broken system, you should try and look it from other points of view.
Apparently you've not been playing SWG for very long if you think that is the case....
DingoBoi wrote:
not really an issue.. find a standard that it does accept and use that
i use EPC RE Level IV as my standard. works fine (you can't use numbers)
Yeah, I was doing this last week. i was using 'SIN Capacitor L6' and it worked great. I had 20 or 30 items on my vendor that were all RE'd and had our guild tag on them. Then just these past few days it blows away no matter what name I seem to use. I guess the only real problem is that you don't get another opportunity to try a different name without RE'ing another component. That's really not a big deal with Level 1 or 2 components but with level 6-8 components it really stinks.
Ibixat wrote:
DingoBoi wrote:
i have and it's not an issue. you don't fix a bug by adding a new feature.
Ewach wrote:
DingoBoi wrote:
not really an issue.. find a standard that it does accept and use that
i use EPC RE Level IV as my standard. works fine (you can't use numbers)
Yes - it really IS an issue. You can't use the above name if the last charge in the RE tool is used up because there's no option to give it a name.
Instead of defending a broken system, you should try and look it from other points of view.
Apparently you've not been playing SWG for very long if you think that is the case....