Shipwright Archive

Thread: Fellow SHipWrights of All Servers POST your Best !

Estan
Fri Nov 05, 2004 11:01 am
#14

Heres one for u all.....9500 energy with579 mass, MK1 reactor



Okei

Master Shipwright

ROGUE SKUNK WORKS, Supply to the Imperial Navy

Solace, on Dantooine


goody24
Sat Nov 06, 2004 7:39 am
#15

Mark 3:


Mass: 7893.8

Rate: 14, 301.9



Built it then gave it to a Guildmate



Aguy / Aegyen
________________________________________________
Blacca
Sat Nov 06, 2004 12:27 pm
#16

I'll post a pic when I'm not working but I have a merchant full of 19.201k Mark V Reactors at 50k Mass



~Brittany Storm~
llStorm Designs Shipforgell
Factory Outlet - Daantooine 500M Outside of the Mining Outpost at -1128 2777
And Check Out my NEW vendor 800M outside of Coronet at 620 -5148
There are two types of people in space, pilots....and flying meatlumps, I design workable solutions for both!
Blacca
Sat Nov 06, 2004 12:29 pm
#17

So hows about chassis? Start with the X Wing has anyone bested 101k Max Total Mass?



~Brittany Storm~
llStorm Designs Shipforgell
Factory Outlet - Daantooine 500M Outside of the Mining Outpost at -1128 2777
And Check Out my NEW vendor 800M outside of Coronet at 620 -5148
There are two types of people in space, pilots....and flying meatlumps, I design workable solutions for both!
Co-valent
Sat Nov 06, 2004 3:59 pm
#18






DiceDuP wrote:

Done


CLICKY (I HOPE)




Very nice JB.





Nightshade - 12 Point Force Sensitive Armoursmith
R.I.S. Certified
J&Js Of Bestine
-1755 -3150, Tatooine






JabboFett
Sun Nov 07, 2004 1:48 am
#19

I have using my best resources...which is a huge waste so i dont do it often...lol



....Kayoss Sith................................
*Master Rifleman / Master Combat Medic
__________________________________________________
....Kayoss' Reigns..........................
*Master Architect / Master Shipwright
__________________________________________________

Vendors are located at -100 2100 right outside the Mining Outpost on Dantooine
Blacca
Sun Nov 07, 2004 1:51 am
#20

What was your resulted total mass? Need to know what the next level of accomplishment should beeee



~Brittany Storm~
llStorm Designs Shipforgell
Factory Outlet - Daantooine 500M Outside of the Mining Outpost at -1128 2777
And Check Out my NEW vendor 800M outside of Coronet at 620 -5148
There are two types of people in space, pilots....and flying meatlumps, I design workable solutions for both!
Jadin1
Sun Nov 07, 2004 7:07 am
#21

My Mark 3 Reactors are 8.1k Mass and 14.4k energy. I use an overcharger subcomponent



Jadin Na'deen -
Rebel Colonel
Master Alliance Pilot
Master officer because nge killed bounty hunter turned trader because nge has no high level content.
Direpath
Sun Nov 07, 2004 10:46 am
#22

I think a large problem with most peoples builds is that they are using the best enhancement for that mark of reactor/weapon/etc. A lot of times, I find that with some components, a mark 2 enhancement is better than a mark 3. For example...


I built a Mark 4 reactor with a mark 3 overcharger.


Mass: 17894

Power: 15390

Cost to Customer: 49500


I then built a Mark 4 reactor with a Mark 4 overcharger:


Mass: 19387

Power: 15581

Cost to Customer: 61875


Is 200 more power worth the extra 1.5k mass and 10k credits? I don't think so. Some might still buy it though.


I use Mark 2 speed limiters in my weapons, and they reduce power per shot as much as a mark 3, only they use less resources (costing less) and don't reduce refire rate as much.


I don't believe that the biggest power output makes the best reactor. In fact, having that much power is a waste of mass unless you need it all.


Another example. I made Mark 3 plating with mark 3 reinforcement. 1000/1000 (roughly) with 7k mass. A plain mark 4 plating is 1200/1200 with 13k mass. The first choice is the best as far as I am concerned. It is the more efficient choice.


The best shipwrights are going to be the ones with the dedication to find better alternatives to just having the highest level pieces of equipment in their ship. The ones who find the most efficient combination for their customers to allow more flexibility in other areas.



Ezrat Sraona..............Vaegam Oodari
Blacca
Sun Nov 07, 2004 2:26 pm
#23






Direpath wrote:

I think a large problem with most peoples builds is that they are using the best enhancement for that mark of reactor/weapon/etc. A lot of times, I find that with some components, a mark 2 enhancement is better than a mark 3. For example...


I built a Mark 4 reactor with a mark 3 overcharger.


Mass: 17894

Power: 15390

Cost to Customer: 49500


I then built a Mark 4 reactor with a Mark 4 overcharger:


Mass: 19387

Power: 15581

Cost to Customer: 61875


Is 200 more power worth the extra 1.5k mass and 10k credits? I don't think so. Some might still buy it though.


I use Mark 2 speed limiters in my weapons, and they reduce power per shot as much as a mark 3, only they use less resources (costing less) and don't reduce refire rate as much.


I don't believe that the biggest power output makes the best reactor. In fact, having that much power is a waste of mass unless you need it all.


Another example. I made Mark 3 plating with mark 3 reinforcement. 1000/1000 (roughly) with 7k mass. A plain mark 4 plating is 1200/1200 with 13k mass. The first choice is the best as far as I am concerned. It is the more efficient choice.


The best shipwrights are going to be the ones with the dedication to find better alternatives to just having the highest level pieces of equipment in their ship. The ones who find the most efficient combination for their customers to allow more flexibility in other areas.






It is worth it if the powerplants going into a YT, a Decimator, or a Nova



~Brittany Storm~
llStorm Designs Shipforgell
Factory Outlet - Daantooine 500M Outside of the Mining Outpost at -1128 2777
And Check Out my NEW vendor 800M outside of Coronet at 620 -5148
There are two types of people in space, pilots....and flying meatlumps, I design workable solutions for both!
Tills
Sun Nov 07, 2004 6:34 pm
#24

Mark 2 Proton Torpedos1534-2437 Qty:12. I have better radioactive to use as well. I need some others to compare too.
BoogerSlinger
Sun Nov 07, 2004 7:19 pm
#25

Mark III reactor= 13.2K Gen rate / 6.5 Mass


Mark V reactor = 17.1 Gen rate / 41.1 Mass


Ohhhhh, only if i had some better steel



____The Took_______

DARK JEDI ELDER
Subcriminal
Sun Jan 23, 2005 10:23 pm
#26

Mark 5 fusion reactor:



  • 19153.4 reactor generation rate

  • 50937.7 mass



Experimental Blaster w/ max damage:



  • 1725.6-3770.6 damage

  • 25.1 energy/shot

  • .345 refire

  • 36,735 mass

  • 2482.7 reactor drain

hope to get screenies soon.

Page 2 of 3