Rifleman Archive

Thread: Is head shot 3 really bad?

GalacticDarkMaster
Mon Sep 15, 2003 3:32 pm
#1
Ok so I've been reading on here not to use head shot 3. Does it really cost more ham to use? I though all the Specials used what ever the guns cost was.......
RaskasBW
Mon Sep 15, 2003 3:35 pm
#2

It costs about 50% more HAM to fire, with an increase in damage of about 25-50% (roughly, very roughly). Since the damage increase isn't exactly great when compared to the HAM increase it's a tough pill to swallow.




Don't you love how a Bounty Hunter can hit someone in the eye at 64 meters away while doing backflips, on a foggy night, through a wall, while afk? Yup, seems balanced to me ...
GalacticDarkMaster
Mon Sep 15, 2003 3:38 pm
#3

hmm I guess it gives me somethign to test tonight


Tezctlpoca
Mon Sep 15, 2003 3:55 pm
#4

I've started using Headshot3 after hitting a tough target ( like a Mountain Squill...40% resist to everything ) after slapping them with a Mindshot2; the effects are just...brutal. To both myself and the squill ;-)


Gonna try to stick with Headshot2 tonight and see if there's a major difference in the amount of time it takes to bring the sucker down....




Oderint dum metuant
Page 1 of 1
Previous Next