Rifleman Archive
Thread: A Comparison of the Rifles in PVP
Page 2 of 2
Solti
Fri Feb 20, 2004 12:14 am
#14
Base rifle on Eclipse before slice will have a min damage of around 130+ and max somewhere in the 350 range. All in all, that gets quite a bit higher than the 105 you have listed after you've gotten it sliced. I don't know, maybe your server just has wierd rifles? Maybe my server has wierd rifles? In any case, it makes a huge difference with damage mitigation.
AmgineEX
Fri Feb 20, 2004 3:11 am
#15
t21 for unarmed, puped jawa for armored unless dmg isnt stellar, then switch to t21. high accuracy laser for def stackers. gg
Goldanin
Sun Feb 29, 2004 9:12 pm
#16
I think that its great that folks put up these tests and comparisons. It really helps to get this kind of info. I only have one question, and I hope I am not being a bother. On the Sunrunner server, all the T21's I find and use, have a base damage much higher than 105, unsliced and without powerup.
Thanks again, and I hope I havent put a fly in the testing ointment, so to speak.
Jonan Hunter
Master Rifleman
Goldanin
Sun Feb 29, 2004 9:19 pm
#17
Also, I just realized that the max damage is 696 with a 32% power up. To get 696 with a power up, would mean that the t21 tested is sliced at around 30+ percent. That would make the min damageproably over 170(since it was a max damage/ mind use power up, with no addition to the min damage).
Thanks again, and Rock On Rifleman Woooot!
Jonan Hunter
Master Rifleman
Ivon
Sun Feb 29, 2004 9:36 pm
#18
run that stuff for my prenerf t21, krayt jawa and 545 max damage disrupter plz 
.
.
o and by the way, disrupter rifles freaking own unarmored people... sooo accurate 
LittleBoo54
Sun Feb 29, 2004 11:39 pm
#19
What you don't mention is the lack of accuracy on Jawa Ions...easily making them the worst rifle for pvp.
Yea sure, you could take a commando/BH down with it, but so could anyone else.
waaha
Mon Mar 01, 2004 5:07 am
#20
G3N0C1DE wrote:
Yea, the new rifle probably won't be too good in pvp, but would those nice range modifiers it will probably be my favorite pve gun.
anyone else notice at idea range the mod next to targets name caps at +50 reguardless of the listed idea range on the weapon?
ibeo
Mon Mar 01, 2004 7:11 am
#21
Okin_Sin wrote:
You have to take in to account, that almost everyone who pvps regularly has stun layers on composite now.
ya but best stun protection i'm seeing is 37 percent......which is nothing
MydnyghtDaywalker
Mon Mar 01, 2004 7:49 am
#22
Ar the numbers on that jawa correct? Mine is 323 before P/U, and it's nto Krayted or anything. Seems very low.
Drachan
Mon Mar 01, 2004 8:32 am
#23
What about Tusken Rifles?
My non-Krayt Tusken is like 280-450. Sounds like it's good against Mitigation, or am I wrong?
My non-Krayt Tusken is like 280-450. Sounds like it's good against Mitigation, or am I wrong?
shadowlith
Mon Mar 01, 2004 11:18 am
#24
Haha, Oh jeeze, I totally forgot about this in my mind numbing grind to Master Doc. I'll fix it all up with proper numbers tomorrow.
Okin_Sin
Mon Mar 01, 2004 1:42 pm
#25
You have to take in to account, that almost everyone who pvps regularly has stun layers on composite now.
Dynastar
Tue Mar 02, 2004 1:10 am
#26
Using this, I compared my T21(236-644) to my Jawa(190-398).
Against a target wearing composite armor, with no stun protection, my T21 will hit for more unless the armor has 57% or greater energy protection.
However, with the appearence of 36% stun on Scylla, my T21 would be more effective all the way until 72% energy protection.
What does this mean? Absolutely nothing, except that all our weapons are situational.
Page 2 of 2