Rifleman Archive
Thread: how many time for kill an ancien krayt with conceal shot ?
Page 2 of 2
Cpl_Fisher
Wed Mar 23, 2005 12:07 pm
#14
wong-fei-hung wrote:
They break, but unless you have a commando and/or a Jedi with you, not really worth the effort. Can kill several Giants in the time it takes to kill one Ancient without em.
I don't think ancients resist break anymore. out of the 15+ ancients last night. nne of there resist broke. There were 4 rifleman strafing him to.
One in particular omes to mind. My buffs died, I went back to coro for buffs, cam ebak out to graveyard, and my buddies were STILL working over the same ancient. I set the thing on fire to put it outof his misery. he died real fast. 
Cpl_Fisher
Wed Mar 23, 2005 7:40 pm
#15
Aajax wrote:
I am a TKM with no other defenses (+20 to KD and +15 to dizzy) Me and a Jedi killed 5 Ancients with me tanking in about 30 mins. I just used Thakitillo and Ithorian mist. I barely got KD'd at all. The jedi was using a 4th Gen saber and when he's force ran low he switched to 1st gen. thats only 2 of us. I don't understand why people think SWORDSMEN are such good tanks? They are practically useless. Just because they have PH's...They don't do any damage to the Ancients. TKM is the best for tanking.
uhm for any krayt but ancients, they are a lot better than TKM's. nobody but commandos and jedi do ANY significant damage to ancients lol. well rifleman can take them down in around 45 min to an hour. This thread is getting seriously hikjacked to lol
Keuller
Thu Mar 24, 2005 1:51 am
#16
I agree, bloody waste of time, takes about 45 minutes to solo one, and I spend a fair bit of time dizzy/KD'd 
Bermag
Thu Mar 24, 2005 2:52 am
#17
For dealing damage swordsman is better but if it is only tanking while someone else (rifleman/men) is dealing the damage TKM is better because of higher toughness. State defenses sucks though.
Page 2 of 2