Ranger Archive
Thread: Real Feedback from Devs...and a note about week 2 submissions
I did actually hear back from the dev responsible for rangers (YAY!):
And while he didn't 'list out' any particulars, he did say that his number 1 goal was addressing the core problem of differentiating rangers from scouts.
In regards to the Week 2 correspondent submission - many of the posts on my week 2 thread are asking for the same things that were in the Week 1 submission. I don't really want to keep repeating the same thing over and over.
If you have not read the week 1 submission, please do so before you post on the week 2 submission. Week two is narrowing the scope of the top five into more specific realms. If my top 5 differs from yours, post yours with a BRIEF explanation. Rants and dissertations deserve their own threads...the week 2 thread is meant to be more of a punch list.
Thanks
Mineras
I'm glad to hear we do have a ranger rep on the dev side. I'm sure he/she isn't dedicated just to us as a profession but at least we have someone beyond Q for Mineras to deal with.
Good job so far Mineras with these duties! Is it out of line to foryou copy theresponse from the dev? It's nice to get a response, but Im not getting the feelingour issues and concernsare actively beingaddressed.