Ranger Archive
Thread: i just want to no a few things on what u wud (if they ever that is) want as a weapon
Page 1 of 1
Fodder650
Fri Dec 24, 2004 2:35 pm
#1
English as a second language. Is would that hard to spell out? Do you think its l33t to do it like that?
Have you noticed the other threads on page 1 and 2 about ranger weapons? About how we really cant do it because we cant favor a melee or ranged ranger?
Have you noticed the other threads on page 1 and 2 about ranger weapons? About how we really cant do it because we cant favor a melee or ranged ranger?
JBMat
Fri Dec 24, 2004 5:10 pm
#2
Posts like this give a bad name to Rangers, Rebels and Pilots.
If you think you are leet - BIG FREAKING HINT - you ain't.
JB
JeCy
Fri Dec 24, 2004 6:27 pm
#3
hey now.. its not nice to make fun of elmer fud.. just because he hasnt killed a duck or rabit in 50 years. That does not mean he is not the best tracker out there.. I mean come on, he finds them no matter where they are.. he is the best ranger ever....
::::wonders if his keys are sticky::: /scold i told you not to drink coke at the computer ! !
Je'Cy
Shobi-T
Sat Dec 25, 2004 1:07 am
#4
Ok here are a few questions i wud like to ask u, u dnt have to answer them if u dnt want to, i just want to see who else wants weapons for rangers aswell
1.)Do you want a weapon for ranger?
2.)Want kind of one wud it be? melee/range
3.)what wud it be?
4.)Do you think the weapon shud have special attachments what rangers have to make (eg, poison tips fora bow)?
5.)What wud u put it with in the 4 trees already and what wud u call it?
Shobi-T
Sat Dec 25, 2004 5:40 pm
#5
How pathetic just saying summot because i haven't spelt something right, just for all you idiots who like correct english here is my how i should really spell would, there are u happy now
Almagill
Sat Dec 25, 2004 7:09 pm
#7
Shobi-T wrote:How pathetic just saying summot because i haven't spelt something right, just for all you idiots who like correct english here is my how i should really spell would, there are u happy now
It is common courtesy and common sense to write clearly and to use conventional spelling and grammar. The more clear your message, the more likely it will receive a positive response.
Please, bear in mind that not everyone using the boards has English as a first language. If that includes you, please, accept my apologies. A genuine error in spelling is one thing, obfuscation is quite another.
Almagill
Sat Dec 25, 2004 7:25 pm
#8
Shobi-T almost wrote:Okay, here are a few questions I would like to ask you. You dont have to answer them if you don't want to, I just want to see who else wants weapons for rangers as well (as me).1.)Do you want a weapon for rangers?2.)Want kind of weapon would it be? melee/range3.)What would it be?4.)Do you think the weapon should have special attachments that rangers have to make (eg, poison tips for a bow)?5.)Where would you put it with in the 4 trees and what would you call it?
1: No. A rangers choice of weapon and combat style is based on their combat profession. As such it lies outwith our tree.
2: See above.
3: See above. (This appears to be a repeat of question 2, merely worded differently?)
4: Craftable power ups to weapons are something that a ranger could make. A schematic for a ranged and a melee PuP could be introduced into one of the trees. The schematic could be somehting which is fashioned in-country and uses largely organics. This could then be applied to the rangers weapon of choice giving a modifier that 'fitted' into the ranger culture.
5: For it to be of use to rangers the weapon PuP schematic should be available at either level I or II, if not at novice level. I think possibly it should be added to the trapping line, or the wilderness line, given tat these two lines involve some crafting. Failing that, bung it in novice.
Message Edited by Almagill on 12-26-2004 02:26 AM
JeCy
Sun Dec 26, 2004 11:28 am
#9
Shobi-T wrote:
How pathetic just saying summot because i haven't spelt something right, just for all you idiots who like correct english here is my how i should really spell would, there are u happy now
It had nothing to do with miss spelling, you know you wrote like that on purpose for some reason maybe soo you could be cool. No one was flaming you for miss spelling, just talking like an idot..
Page 1 of 1