Ranger Archive

Thread: hunt master

Sariin
Sun Aug 10, 2003 2:05 am
#1

*disclaimer* the following post is me being bitchy and venting some complaints.


i just got the title 'hunt master' a little while ago, and found it odd that i am not a very good master at hunting. in fact the only reason im able to bring down tough animals is because of my rifle skills. maybe they should change to title to "master of havesting stuff that noone really needs or wants because a novice scout can do the same thing as you." probably some of you are thinking about the creature to hit bonus, well that seems good doesn't it? but i really see no significant difference when i play with others who arent rangers.

second2nunn
Sun Aug 10, 2003 5:16 am
#2

Well, we shall see. Maybe the Devs will grace us with some sort of Track or Locate Creature commadns for the Field Bio Tree.



Idapectai Ourun -ASB-

Master Smuggler/Teras Kasi Master
Force Combat Prowess 0 0 4 4
Enhanced Reflexes Novice
EQRadio @ www.csr-networks.com
JonSee
Mon Aug 11, 2003 4:53 am
#3

Sariin I agree with you , although I'm not as pessimistic about it as I usually am today . Hopefully things change for the better soon
Radcliffe
Wed Aug 13, 2003 6:09 am
#4

I will say this - we are better at hunting when compared to someone of comparable ranged weapon skill. I hunt with a pistoleer routinely and she is roughly my skill level. I typically own creatures compared to her. Those extra pluses apparently do add up.



Zandahl Dubh [ITC]

Zandahl's Safari and Travel
Theed, Naboo
Sariin
Fri Aug 15, 2003 1:03 am
#5

yea... ok thats only because of your ranged skills. im glad you can see a difference in having the creature to hit bonus but its added bonus is pretty pathetic for having a whole column of a class filled. it in no way deserves the title of hunt master.

Page 1 of 1
Previous Next