Ranger Archive
Thread: WTH!!!!
Page 3 of 3
Phenix1050
Thu Jul 21, 2005 11:29 am
#27
Pheeeeeeniiiiiiix is also a good name for a resource.
Two people and I on RIN on Eclipse, started doing that a while ago. Tomo, Tere and myself each accentuate the vowels for some reason. So in RIN, when we say Hi to one another, it's
Tooooooooooomoooooooooooo
Teeeeeeeeeeereeeeeeeeeeeee
and
Pheeeeeeeeeeee'niiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiix
ThGilsRooc
Thu Jul 21, 2005 3:56 pm
#30
AgonThalia wrote:
ThGilsRooc wrote:
Hell, with such low stats as 17 OQ, I'd put it through the creature recycler for the 200 stats down the board.
I only wish professions like BE allowed them to reengineer meat (like shipwrights can with components) so that the process would pick out the best stats from various types thrown into the hopper to reveal a new and improved resource plus a percentage improvement. That would be mackdaddy awesome. Too often is the case when I harvest and one stat is nice while the others plain suck. In other words:
OQ 3
PE 999
FL 109
DR 365
You get the picture.Message Edited by ThGilsRooc on 07-21-2005 12:09 PM
Reminds me of the curing meat/ tanning hide thread discussion we had a year ago or so![]()
/snap fingers I remember that now. Yeah... Great idea. Seems they took the idea and recycled it for SW.
ThGilsRooc
Thu Jul 21, 2005 4:25 pm
#31
AgonThalia wrote:
ThGilsRooc wrote:
Hell, with such low stats as 17 OQ, I'd put it through the creature recycler for the 200 stats down the board.
I only wish professions like BE allowed them to reengineer meat (like shipwrights can with components) so that the process would pick out the best stats from various types thrown into the hopper to reveal a new and improved resource plus a percentage improvement. That would be mackdaddy awesome. Too often is the case when I harvest and one stat is nice while the others plain suck. In other words:
OQ 3
PE 999
FL 109
DR 365
You get the picture.Message Edited by ThGilsRooc on 07-21-2005 12:09 PM
Reminds me of the curing meat/ tanning hide thread discussion we had a year ago or so![]()
You'll see my original reply to the thread on the first page, halfway down.
ThGilsRooc
Fri Jul 22, 2005 12:06 am
#32
Hell, with such low stats as 17 OQ, I'd put it through the creature recycler for the 200 stats down the board.
I only wish professions like BE allowed them to reengineer meat (like shipwrights can with components) so that the process would pick out the best stats from various types thrown into the hopper to reveal a new and improved resource plus a percentage improvement. That would be mackdaddy awesome. Too often is the case when I harvest and one stat is nice while the others plain suck. In other words:
OQ 3
PE 999
FL 109
DR 365
You get the picture.
I only wish professions like BE allowed them to reengineer meat (like shipwrights can with components) so that the process would pick out the best stats from various types thrown into the hopper to reveal a new and improved resource plus a percentage improvement. That would be mackdaddy awesome. Too often is the case when I harvest and one stat is nice while the others plain suck. In other words:
OQ 3
PE 999
FL 109
DR 365
You get the picture.
Message Edited by ThGilsRooc on 07-21-2005 12:09 PM
AgonThalia
Fri Jul 22, 2005 12:14 am
#33
ThGilsRooc wrote:
Hell, with such low stats as 17 OQ, I'd put it through the creature recycler for the 200 stats down the board.
I only wish professions like BE allowed them to reengineer meat (like shipwrights can with components) so that the process would pick out the best stats from various types thrown into the hopper to reveal a new and improved resource plus a percentage improvement. That would be mackdaddy awesome. Too often is the case when I harvest and one stat is nice while the others plain suck. In other words:
OQ 3
PE 999
FL 109
DR 365
You get the picture.
Message Edited by ThGilsRooc on 07-21-2005 12:09 PM
Reminds me of the curing meat/ tanning hide thread discussion we had a year ago or so
AgonThalia
Fri Jul 22, 2005 12:16 am
#34
http://forums.station.sony.com/swg/board/message?board.id=ranger&message.id=44060&query.id=0#M44060
Page 3 of 3