Ranger Archive
Thread: Awful big to have no bones
Page 2 of 2
BladePride
Fri Jul 30, 2004 9:21 am
#14
I am seeing a new Ranger skill here for a Ranger fix.
/poppicket
If a Picket is air filled:
Ranger runs up to Picket with his new Ranger Weapon the “Picket Popper Knife”.
/poppicket – with a big rush of air the Picket flies into the sky and lands 60m away in a big pile of Meat and Hide.
Ranger runs up to Picket with his new Ranger Weapon the “Picket Popper Knife”.
/poppicket – with a big rush of air the Picket flies into the sky and lands 60m away in a big pile of Meat and Hide.
If a Picket is fluid filled:
Ranger runs up to Picket with his new Ranger Cloths the “Ranger SCUBA suit” and a large glass.
Ok well you get the idea.
Ranger runs up to Picket with his new Ranger Cloths the “Ranger SCUBA suit” and a large glass.
Ok well you get the idea.
Ocean Pride – Master Ranger - Lowca
Seiryuu
Fri Jul 30, 2004 10:21 am
#15
I think that is entirely dependent upon the Bothan... Watch out for aggro though. 
Phenix1050
Fri Jul 30, 2004 1:37 pm
#16
I also think it depends on the person trying to do the milking. I object to Fred milking me, but I'd definately let....nevermind I'm too polite to name names about who I WOULD let milk me. You know who you are. 
Springbok
Fri Jul 30, 2004 3:28 pm
#17
Milk a wookiee, its higher quality. Unless of course the Bothan is still dripping from a recent punch bowl foray. I think the mainchallenge with milking a Bothan is the 5 meter proximity rule changes to about 15 centimeters.
lammergeier
Fri Jul 30, 2004 10:43 pm
#18
what's REALLY baffling is that rancors are 'part arachnid and part crustacean.'
now, with what I know about comparitive physiology and phylogeny... spiders and clams don't have bones. it takes a VERTEBRATE creature to have bones (and a few aquatic vertebrates don't have bones at all).
so... do we want pikets to be bony, at the expense of rancors? or are we willing to accept a certain level of tomfoolery and shenanigans in basic imaginary creature dynamics?
now, with what I know about comparitive physiology and phylogeny... spiders and clams don't have bones. it takes a VERTEBRATE creature to have bones (and a few aquatic vertebrates don't have bones at all).
so... do we want pikets to be bony, at the expense of rancors? or are we willing to accept a certain level of tomfoolery and shenanigans in basic imaginary creature dynamics?
StikerRunningfly
Sat Jul 31, 2004 4:22 pm
#19
Gelotri wrote:
Fodder650 wrote:
Does it seem correct that Pikets and Thunes have no harvestable bones?
Simple question
Makes about as much sense as a lizard having avian meat (Voritor Lizards)
Psst voritor lizards have carnivore meat (and avian bones)
EdSurly
Sat Jul 31, 2004 10:17 pm
#21
LOL, Im not a Ranger but a Bounty Hunter perusing these borads and came here..I haven't laughed this hard on these boards in a long time It's nice to visit a proffesion forum where everyone isn't b*tching and moaning all the time.
It's nice to visit a proffesion forum where everyone isn't b*tching and moaning all the time.
Iseult
Sun Aug 01, 2004 2:36 am
#22
lammergeier wrote:
what's REALLY baffling is that rancors are 'part arachnid and part crustacean.'
now, with what I know about comparitive physiology and phylogeny... spiders and clams don't have bones. it takes a VERTEBRATE creature to have bones (and a few aquatic vertebrates don't have bones at all).
so... do we want pikets to be bony, at the expense of rancors? or are we willing to accept a certain level of tomfoolery and shenanigans in basic imaginary creature dynamics?
hehe - you know what they say: ranger who screw with rancor catch crabs!
Iseult
Master Ranger / Mediocre Rifleperson
Bloodfin
Page 2 of 2